Gabbard Discovers 2020 Election Rigging Evidence, Next Movie Being Prepped – Ep. 3717

SPREAD THE WORD

Watch The X22 Report On Video

pt>
Gabbard Discovers 2020 Election Rigging Evidence, Next Movie Being Prepped
Click On Picture To See Larger Picture

The [DS]/[CB] are moving forward with their climate agenda, the people of the world are not going to go along with it. Germany sheds almost 250,000 jobs because of the climate agenda. Trump fires Fed Gov Lisa Cook, she will not leave, this case will go to the Supreme Court and will decide if Trump has the authority to fire Fed Gov, the court will rule in his favor. The [DS] is trying everything to delay Trump before the midterms, it is not working. Each time a Judge tries and it is overturned Trump has more leverage. Trump is showing the people of this country who the true treasonous criminals are, the next movie is coming soon, it is being prepped. Tulsi Gabbard has discovered 2020 election rigging evidence. People will soon learn that our government was overthrown by the same people in the Russian Collusion hoax.It’s all connected.

 


Economy

 discriminatory actions are removed, I, as President of the United States, will impose substantial additional Tariffs on that Country’s Exports to the U.S.A., and institute Export restrictions on our Highly Protected Technology and Chips. America, and American Technology Companies, are neither the “piggy bank” nor the “doormat” of the World any longer. Show respect to America and our amazing Tech Companies or, consider the consequences! Thank you for your attention to this matter.
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

 

 

 have fair and free elections in this country, and that’s why openly Commie Marxist scum/globalist cult people keep being elected over and over and over again as their big blue cities turn into literal shitholes, it’s ALSO a vile façade that the private family-owned banking entity we’ve all been taught to refer to as ‘the Federal Reserve’ sets US monetary policy FOR THE BENEFIT OF AND TO MEET THE INTERESTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERCA AND IT’S CITIZENS. It most certain DOES NOT. The Fed DOES NOT set US monetary policy to benefit Americans. Keep watching, as Donald Trump continues to draw this vile globalist cult of Luciferians out into the open.

  • The Supreme Court again could be asked to rule on the extent of executive power after President Donald Trump announced he was removing Lisa Cook, a Federal Reserve governor, from her position.
  • Trump on Monday posted a letter to Cook informing her of his decision to remove her from the Fed “for cause.” He previously had called on her to resign over an accusation from one of his officials that she committed mortgage fraud.

Source:newsmax.com

  does on behalf of the Fed as a Governor starting today will not be valid. And the Fed could be held responsible for allowing a non-employee to continue to act like an employee. Restated, if the Fed allows her to stay and continue to be a Governor, and the court rules that Trump can fire her (again, even if it is later in an appeal), then Jay Powell has potentially committed a “for-cause” offense for which he could be fired. (allowing a non-Fed employee to make decisions and policy on behalf of the Federal Reserve.)

The notion of the Fed being “independent” is at odds with constitutional government.  
The Federal Reserve (Fed), established by Congress in 1913, operates with a degree of independence from direct political control, meaning its monetary policy decisions—such as setting interest rates and managing the money supply—are largely insulated from interference by the President, Congress, or other elected officials. This structure aims to prevent short-term political pressures from influencing economic policy.   this independence conflicts with core principles of the U.S. Constitution, which emphasizes accountability, separation of powers, and democratic governance through elected representatives. 

1. The Constitution is designed to ensure that government power remains accountable to the people through elected officials, as reflected in its republican structure (e.g., Article IV, Section 4 guarantees a republican form of government). An independent Fed, however, places immense authority in the hands of unelected officials who are not directly answerable to voters. For instance, the Fed can effectively impose economic burdens like inflation—which acts as a hidden tax on citizens—without electoral repercussions. This setup is seen as undemocratic because it allows “central planning” by experts insulated from public oversight, akin to rule by “philosopher kings,” which contradicts the Founders’ intent for accountable governance.

A 1964 congressional study highlighted this, concluding that an independent central bank is “essentially undemocratic” and runs counter to constitutional accountability.

2. Infringement on the Unitary Executive and Article II Powers Article II vests “the executive Power” in the President, implying a unitary executive structure where the President must have the ability to direct, supervise, and remove subordinates to ensure faithful execution of the laws. The Fed’s independence undermines this through “for-cause” removal protections for its Board of Governors and the indirect appointment of Federal Reserve Bank presidents, who serve on the powerful Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) that sets monetary policy. Originalist critics argue this creates unconstitutional insulation, as the President cannot freely remove or control these officials, diluting executive accountability and energy.  This view aligns with Supreme Court precedents like Myers v. United States (1926), which emphasized presidential removal power, and more recent cases such as Seila Law LLC v. CFPB (2020), which struck down similar protections for independent agencies as violating separation of powers.  Multi-layered removal restrictions for FOMC members (e.g., Reserve Bank presidents can only be removed indirectly through governors) further exacerbate this, as noted in Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB (2010), which invalidated such “multilevel” protections.

3. Improper Delegation of Congressional Powers Under Article I Article I, Section 8 grants Congress exclusive authority “To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof,” and to manage taxation and borrowing. By delegating these powers to an independent Fed, Congress is seen as abdicating its constitutional duties, allowing an unaccountable body to control the money supply, create debt (e.g., through quantitative easing), and influence fiscal outcomes like deficits. Critics contend this delegation evades checks and balances, as the Fed’s actions—such as monetizing trillions in debt or running losses that increase the national debt—directly impact congressional responsibilities without oversight.

4.  The Appointments Clause (Article II, Section 2) requires that principal officers be appointed by the President with Senate confirmation, and even inferior officers must be appointed by the President, courts, or department heads.  the Fed’s structure allows Reserve Bank presidents—key FOMC voters with “enormous power” over national economic policy—to be appointed by bank directors (partly selected by private bankers) rather than the President. Originalists argue these presidents exercise principal-officer-level authority due to their equal voting weight on the FOMC, yet they lack proper appointment, violating constitutional requirements.   This setup doesn’t fit the Madisonian tripartite framework (legislative, executive, judicial branches), forcing the Fed outside traditional government structures.

5.  The Constitution’s system of checks and balances ensures no branch or entity accumulates unchecked power. Fed independence exempts it from this, allowing it to operate autonomously despite wielding influence comparable to the three branches combined (e.g., economic regulation akin to legislation, execution of monetary policy, and quasi-judicial oversight of banks). This autonomy is viewed as incompatible with the Founders’ design, where all power sources must be mutually restrained to prevent tyranny. In summary, while the Fed’s independence is defended by some as necessary for effective monetary policy (e.g., to solve credible commitment issues in borrowing under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Public Debt Clause

4962

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 000000 No.17751801
Who are the Silent Thieves?
Why are they manipulating you?
How are they stealing your wealth?
Bubble.
Crash.
Steal.
Lie.
Repeat.
What is inflation?
Monetary manipulation.
Taxation without representation.
PUT AN END TO THE ENDLESS.
1913.
Q

 

Trump Admin Signals It’s Not Done Gobbling Up Ownership Of Major American Companies

  • Lutnick said in a Tuesday interview with CNBC’s “Squawk Box” that “there’s a monstrous discussion about defense” in response to a question about whether there is a “line” on the U.S. government owning stakes in private companies. The Commerce secretary also claimed that American defense contractor Lockheed Martin is “basically an arm of the U.S. government.”
  • “Lockheed Martin makes 97% of their revenue from the US government,” Lutnick told CNBC. “They are basically an arm of the U.S. government. They make exquisite munitions. I mean, amazing things that can knock a missile out of the air when it’s coming towards you. 
  • Lockheed Martin was notably ranked as the top defense company in the world by revenue in 2024, according to DefenseNews.
  • “If we are adding fundamental value to your business, I think it’s fair for [President] Donald Trump to think about the American people,” Lutnick said.

Source: dailycaller.com


Political/Rights

 

 


DOGE


Geopolitical

71% of Britons Say Left-Wing Starmer Doing Bad Job on Borders, Farage’s Reform Most Trusted
  • Vast majority of Britons think the UK government is doing a bad job on borders and asylum, polling finds, with Nigel Farage’s party most-trusted to get it right.
  • More polling for Britain’s bullheaded left-wing government illustrating the disconnect between government policy and public opinion, with a overwhelming 71 per cent of voters saying they believe the Prime Minister is handling the migrant hotel issue badly.
  • Even more damaging for the government in the results, by pollster YouGov for The Times, is the revelation even a majority — at 56 per cent — of Labour voters agree that the government is doing a bad job.
Source: breibart.com

War/Peace

Trump-Allied Polish President Nawrocki Wants to Criminalize Ukrainian ‘Bandera’ Neo-Nazi Ideology (VIDEOS)

  •  
  • The Volyn massacre was a series of war crimes perpetrated by Ukrainian Nazi collaborators, under national hero Stepan Bandera, that led to the ethnic cleansing of the Polish population. To this day, Warsaw considers the Volyn tragedy to be genocide of Poles.
  • Back in September 2024, when Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky aggressively refused to discuss the issue, Poland started pressuring Ukraine to exhume the victims of the massacre, giving them proper burials.
  •  Donald J. Trump ally President Karol Nawrocki wants to crack down on the cult of WW2 Nazi collaborator (and Ukrainian national hero) Stephan Bandera.

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

  • Lee asked Trump to meet again with Kim, as he did during his first term, and Trump said he would, touting his “very good relationship” with Kim.
  • “I will do that and we’ll have talks,” Trump said. “We think we can do something in that regard, with respect to North and South and I think you are much more prone to doing that than other leaders that I’ve been working with from South Korea, and we’ll work on that. I think it’s very good to work on that.”

Source: justthenews.com

 

  But the reality is that war is bad.

Defense Dept suggests we have no Offensive capabilities and that’s weakness. .

The United States Department of War was established in 1789 to oversee the nation’s military affairs, primarily managing the Army and, for periods, naval and air forces. Following World War II, the U.S. military underwent significant reorganization to address inefficiencies in coordination and command structure experienced during the global conflict.  In 1947, President Harry S. Truman signed the National Security Act, which merged the Department of War (renamed the Department of the Army), the Department of the Navy, and the newly created Department of the Air Force into a unified entity called the National Military Establishment (NME), headed by a civilian Secretary of Defense.  This aimed to streamline operations, reduce inter-service rivalries, and enhance civilian oversight of the military. Two years later, in 1949, amendments to the National Security Act renamed the NME to the Department of Defense.  The primary reasons for this specific name change included:

  • Reflecting a postwar shift in emphasis: The term “Defense” was chosen over “War” to signal a focus on national security, preparedness, and defensive strategies rather than aggression or perpetual conflict, aligning with the emerging Cold War era where the U.S. positioned itself as a defender against threats like communism.  
  • Strengthening unified civilian leadership: The rename consolidated authority under the Secretary of Defense, demoting the secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force from cabinet-level positions and subordinating them to the new department head. This addressed WWII-era challenges with fragmented command and improved efficiency in a modern, multi-branch military. 
  • Broader global trend: Similar renamings occurred in other countries post-WWII, moving away from “war” ministries to “defense” ones to emphasize protection and deterrence in an era of international alliances and nuclear threats

Medical/False Flags


[DS] Agenda


President Trump’s Plan

  have burned a paper bag full of cat poop and he would have gotten equally arrested. Bottom line–you can’t burn ANYTHING in Lafayette Park. The US flag stunt was just LARPing.

 is clear: a safer city for all.

 

  not hold someone on bail who, common sense says should have been held!” Trump’s National Guard deployment pressure is now causing a shockwave across the country – they don’t want to be embarrassed next. They know if Trump deploys to their city, crime will be cleaned up…and Trump will get the credit.

  •   is collapsing under its own failure—Yolo County’s study showed 169% higher recidivism when criminals walk free. Trump’s executive order targeting bail reform isn’t just optics—it’s a wrecking ball to the soft-on-crime racket. When cities face real consequences—federal aid cuts, Guard deployments, public backlash—even progressive governors fold. Hochul’s flip isn’t leadership—it’s political survival. The message is clear: enforce the law or get steamrolled by those who will.

  this constant bloodbath and then rejoicing in it is EVIL. And you should praise God every single day that President Trump is in the White House.” –

  If this was the standard nationwide, murder rates would plummet. DC will be the blueprint.https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1960391379726553583

54 percent of voters say Trump’s actions in DC are justified: Poll   

  • More than half of respondents said they believed President Trump’s actions aimed at reducing crime in Washington, D.C., are justified, according to a Harvard Caps/Harris poll released Monday.
  • While 54 percent said the actions are justified, 46 percent of voters surveyed called Trump’s actions “unjustified and not necessary,” according to the poll. Opinions on Trump’s strategy to reduce crime in Washington were strongly divided along party lines, with 72 percent of Democrats calling the actions “unjustified and not necessary” and 85 percent of Republicans calling them “justified and necessary.” Among independents, 47 percent of respondents called Trump’s actions “justified and necessary,” while 53 percent said they were “unjustified and not necessary.”

Source: thehill.com

The NG will be deployed until Nov

  •  police under federal control; legally, it was cut and dry Now people from democrat-run cities all over the country are all but demanding NG presence to bring back law and order   “Strategic. Pre_PLANNED” However, expanding the mission by pre-positioning active duty troops to quell civil unrest in response to high-profile arrests is where it gets interesting…
  • Under Title 32, governors need to approve NG troop deployments to their state Under Title 10, their approval is not required so long as they don’t actively obstruct the orders of the President And if they do, we all know what comes next   Tom Homan has prepared the public for this exact scenario and made very clear where the line is…
  • He also famously said “wait until you see what’s coming” when asked why he hasn’t arrested sanctuary city leadership Somehow I tend to doubt that blue states are going to comply with Title 32, having openly stated that they will resist ICE, which means Trump “will be forced” to federalize the NG under Title 10 This begs the question…
  • how far will they go in “resisting”? “THINK OPTICS” Does anyone actually think these people are going to stand down when troops arrive, comply and not obstruct the enforcement of federal law? Day after day, we keep hearing leftist “leaders” brazenly defy the lawful orders of the President…and we all know why “You are watching a ‘scripted’ movie” As Elon said, “the court of public opinion is the only thing that matters” Kash told us “We are building a case for the American public.” “We are educating the American public.”
  • Trump is getting the vast majority of the people on his side prior to overtly declaring the Insurrection Act, which IMO will happen sooner rather than later

  control of deciding who gets to work for the President. Scavino’s taking over for Sergio Gor, who was nominated for US Ambassador to India

 that means the Republican presidential nominee’s pathway to 270 Electoral College votes DRASTICALLY expands, per NYT. In a scenario like this, the Republican could win the Sun Belt states, none of the Rust Belt swing states, and win the presidency – NOT the case in 2024. Other combinations open up as well. Doom.