Reports 

Trump Controls Iran, Bigger Than People Can Imagine,Ask Yourself,Why Is The [DS] Panicking? – Ep. 3882

x22report
SPREAD THE WORD

Watch The X22 Report On Video

pt>

Trump Controls Iran, Bigger Than People Can Imagine,Ask Yourself,Why Is The [DS] Panicking?
Click On Picture To See Larger Picture
Trump is now bringing the pain to the [CB] system that they have established and where they are trying to move us to. He now has control over the energy, he took it from the [CB]. The oil prices will begin to drop soon and the fake narrative of high prices will fall to the waist side. Trump has shifted the mechanisms. Today, Trump controls Iran, the [DS] fell right into the trap and Iran has no way out of what Trump has done to them. He never wanted to have a ground invasion or regime change, he wanted control of the energy, the Strait and he has it. This is much bigger than people can imagine, Trump is taking down the [DS] system globally, the structure is behind destroyed. The system that the [DS] created is all around us, it is the money laundering, Epstein, trafficking of humans, religion, red cross, politicians etc and it is being dismantled piece by piece. Trump has the leverage, ask yourself, why is the [DS] panicking over Iran?

 

Economy

  billion. Furthermore, Chinese investments and construction contracts in Iran have reached $25 billion. Meanwhile, Middle East trade with China has more than doubled since 2017, to $317 billion in 2024. That is nearly 4 times the $85 billion in trade with the US in 2024. China is heavily tied to the Middle East’s economy.

 

 Meanwhile, the S&P 500 is down less than -0.5% today after rising +5% prior to negotiations on hopes of a peace deal. The reality is that investors are preparing for prolonged inflation and the acceleration of the AI Revolution. Own assets or be left behind.

  energy, insurance, and enforcement merge into the hidden operating system of the British “empire”… The Strait of Hormuz is the pressure point because control of that corridor shapes the cost of movement, the pricing of risk, and the financial architecture built downstream of global energy flow… In that sense, Iran is the visible proxy while the real signal travels far beyond Tehran and into the transnational machinery that long governed passage through managed instability and silent extraction… When sovereign power retakes the sea gates, the old order loses one of its deepest control mechanisms, and the legal-financial channels beneath commerce begin shifting back into a different hands…

Treasury, IRS Propose Rules For 1 Percent Remittance Tax On Some Money Sent To Foreign Countries 

  • The Internal Revenue Service and the Department of the Treasury proposed regulations on Friday regarding the new excise tax, established under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, on certain remittances made abroad.
  • “Beginning Jan. 1, 2026, a 1 percent remittance transfer tax applies to remittances sent from the United States to recipients in foreign countries when the sender provides cash, a money order, a cashier’s check, or other similar physical instrument to the remittance transfer provider,” the IRS said in an April 10 statement.
  • “The sender is liable for the tax, and remittance transfer providers are required to collect the remittance transfer tax from certain senders, make semimonthly deposits, and file quarterly returns with the IRS. If the remittance transfer provider does not collect the tax from the sender, the tax becomes a liability of the remittance transfer provider.”
  • The proposed regulations clarify how the remittance transfer tax would be applied.
  • There are roughly 600 money services businesses licensed as money transmitters in the United States, out of which more than 200 operate through around 500,000 authorized agents, the IRS said, citing data from the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System.
  • Between 2019 and 2024, money transfers to domestic and foreign destinations via money services businesses increased from $1.3 to $4 trillion.
  • “Money transmitted to foreign destinations (remittance transfers) accounted for 9 to 25 percent of the total money transmissions, equaling $236 billion in 2019, growing to almost $1 trillion in 2021 and 2022, but decreasing to $365 billion in 2024,” the notice said.

Source: zerohedge.com

 

Political/Rights

After ‘Unlawful Detention’ Claims Unravel, Wisconsin Sheriff Sues Woman and IL Commissioner for Defamation 

  • Anti-ICE advocates do anything and everything they can to try to paint law enforcement in a bad light, even peddle a false story.
  • Now, Dodge County Sheriff Dale Schmidt is suing an Illinois woman and a politician for defamation after her story about being transferred to Schmidt’s jurisdiction in Wisconsin for an immigration hold has unraveled.
  • Illinois resident Sundas Naqvi, 28, a U.S.-born citizen, garnered national attention last month after she and five traveling companions returned to the U.S. on March 5 from a work trip.
  • Naqvi claims she was held by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at O’Hare International Airport for 30+ hours, and was then moved to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Broadview, Illinois, before finally being transferred to the Dodge County Jail in Wisconsin. She claims she was ultimately released without her belongings.
  • Cook County Commissioner Kevin Morrison affirmed her claims, telling WISN 12 News at the time, “They have been lying from the very start of this. I don’t think they want to own up to the fact that, once again, they have illegally detained an American citizen without due process.”
  • The story was used as an example to slander ICE with accusations of indiscriminately arresting Americans, and was amplified on social media.

 

  • Naqvi’s story, however, quickly unraveled.

  her arrival to the United States. Ms. Naqvi was not taken into custody or transferred to ICE for detention

  • Sheriff Schmidt investigated Naqvi’s claims and uncovered that hotel records show she checked into the Hampton Inn & Suites in Rosemont, Illinois, near the airport, for the duration of the alleged detention.
  • Additionally, surveillance footage and other records place her in Wisconsin with an acquaintance (including shopping at a gas station), not in custody.

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

DOGE

Geopolitical

Image

peter myjar

 

 

 

 

War/Peace

 Meysam is the son of one of the Islamic Republic’s first intelligence censors, the guy who shut down journalists right after the Revolution. Even after moving to America, he was still getting 40 million Tomans (~$11,000) every month from Tehran, wired in foreign cash through a shady Ferdowsi Square exchange. His dad’s old colleague funneled another 30 million from every official check straight to Meysam’s family. This is the same guy who helped pick Ghalibaf’s current top advisor, and who presents himself as “PhD in Media Psychology” from a U.S. university. The slick propaganda style you have been seeing in his posts is not Ghalibaf. It’s Iranian regime’s ghostwriter in California. The regime’s loudest voice is being run from the country it claims to hate.

 

No, this is not true. It’s recycled propaganda using old footage. 

 

  • The video is from March 2026, not April. It shows U.S. strikes during Operation Epic Fury (late February–early March 2026) that destroyed multiple Iranian naval ships right at Bandar Abbas naval base and nearby ports. Credible sources, satellite imagery, and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) reports confirm dozens of Iranian vessels (frigates, corvettes, support ships like IRIS Makran, and others) were hit, set ablaze, or sunk in the harbor.
     

 

 US Navy did it themselves! And Iran won’t be able to sell one single solitary barrel of oil until they cave. It’s laughable anyone thinks Trump didn’t have a plan all along

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces will begin implementing a blockade of all maritime traffic entering and exiting Iranian ports on April 13 at 10 a.m. ET, in accordance with the President’s proclamation.
The blockade will be enforced impartially against vessels of all nations entering or departing Iranian ports and coastal areas, including all Iranian ports on the Arabian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. CENTCOM forces will not impede freedom of navigation for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz to and from non-Iranian ports.
Additional information will be provided to commercial mariners through a formal notice prior to the start of the blockade. All mariners are advised to monitor Notice to Mariners broadcasts and contact U.S. naval forces on bridge-to-bridge channel 16 when operating in the Gulf of Oman and Strait of Hormuz approaches.

  summit to advance work on a coordinated, independent, multinational plan to safeguard international shipping when the conflict ends.

 

 

Who is really blocking

Hormuz Blockade: Europe Mobilizing Against the U.S., Not the Iran Regime 

  • Instead, Europe blames Trump for the Hormuz closure, completely ignoring the fact that it is the IRGC, not the U.S., that has closed the strait.
  • Their refusal to help reopen it is a classic example of cutting off your nose to spite your face, since Europe’s energy supplies are at stake, not America’s. However, anger at Trump is mobilizing Europe to form a coalition to protect the Strait from America rather than from Iran.
Source: thegatewaypundit.com

 

  reputation is peace, into a hopeless stalemate was not naïveté, but design. The U.S. didn’t go to talk. It went to witness. And when Tehran overturned the table with the camera rolling, the trap was complete: legitimacy secured, perception shaped, and the next move pre‑justified. Have a nice day.

 U.S. Navy ships blockading the strait? If they do, Trump unleashes our military again and starts eliminating more of the leaders standing in the way of peace. But I don’t think they will attack our ships. They’re holding out on a few things but have zero leverage.

But here’s why the blockade will quickly bring them back to the peace table: “The U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz would cost Iran approximately $276M/day in lost exports and disrupt $159M/day in imports, a combined economic damage of ~$435M/day, or $13B/month.” “Over 90% of Iran’s $109.7B in annual trade transits the Persian Gulf. Oil/gas accounts for 80% of government export earnings and 23.7% of GDP. Kharg Island alone generates ~$53B/year to“$78 billion a year in energy revenue.” That immediately cuts off a massive amount of money flowing into the Iranian economy.

But there’s more. “CURRENCY COLLAPSE ACCELERANT: The rial has already cratered from 42,000 to 1.5M per dollar. Banks are limiting withdrawals to $18-30/day.

Overall inflation: 47.5%. A blockade eliminating all forex earnings pushes the rial into terminal hyperinflation.

The regime issued its largest-ever banknote, 10M rials, worth about $7.” Iran is ALREADY experiencing hyperinflation and it’s about to get a whole lot worse

. But the blockade is about to do something else: “Extremely important topic is the storage clock: Iran has ~50-55M barrels of total onshore oil storage, roughly 60% full.

Spare capacity: ~20M barrels. With 1.5M bbl/day of surplus production that normally exports, storage fills in ~13 DAYS. After that, Iran must shut in wells.”

“Why is this very important: when mature oil wells shut down, bottom water rushes in, a process called water coning. Oil droplets get permanently trapped in rock pores.

This oil can never be recovered. Iran’s fields already decline 5-8% annually. Forced shut-ins could permanently destroy 300,000-500,000 bbl/day of production capacity, that’s $9-15B/year in revenue, gone forever.” 13 days.

That’s a small window.

Leverage and pressure being applied.

“BOTTOM LINE: A naval blockade imposes ~$435M/day in combined economic damage. Storage fills in 13 days, forcing well shut-ins that cause permanent reservoir damage.

The rial enters terminal collapse. Iran’s alternatives outside the Strait can replace less than 10% of Gulf throughput.

The blockade makes continued resistance economically impossible.” threadreaderapp.com/thread/2043456 And don’t forget this important point: Iran isn’t the only target of this blockade.

The bigger target is the oligarchy of puppet masters in Europe, who are also feeling the financial “squeeze” and being FORCED to buy American energy now.

The wealth that has been stolen from America for many generations, is flowing back to America in multiple ways now, including tariffs. Q drop 1454 Jun 11, 2018 12:56:26 PM EDT EU sanctions (IRAN). Leaders of EU only care about protecting flow of MONEY – NOT the safety and security of their people/world.

IRAN deal orchestrated for the sole purpose of lifting sanctions (blockade) to allow access of foreign businesses for individual & co-wide enrichment. SCAM!!!

Nothing to do w/ NUKES (cover_) Hussein pallets of cash.

Hussein secret auth to convert USD.

More coming. No MSM coverage.

Got Popcorn?

Q Trump holds all the cards.

He controls the world’s reserve currency and the most powerful military in the world. Our military and the dollar “were” used by the cabal, to police the world and force compliance.

Trump has now turned those weapons against the cabal and their proxies. Trump has removed centralized control over energy in the Strait of Hormuz. A new Golden Age approaches.

 

 energy, insurance, and enforcement merge into the hidden operating system of the British “empire”… The Strait of Hormuz is the pressure point because control of that corridor shapes the cost of movement, the pricing of risk, and the financial architecture built downstream of global energy flow… In that sense, Iran is the visible proxy while the real signal travels far beyond Tehran and into the transnational machinery that long governed passage through managed instability and silent extraction… When sovereign power retakes the sea gates, the old order loses one of its deepest control mechanisms, and the legal-financial channels beneath commerce begin shifting back into a different hands…

Medical/False Flags

[DS] Agenda

  $15MM. One was dissolved in 2011, yet between 2020-2024 it billed medicaid over $1.8MM. Our tax dollars are paying businesses dissolved over a decade ago. They don’t even check. They just send them money. It’s infuriating.

President Trump’s Plan

Obama Judge Dismisses Trump’s $10 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against Wall Street Journal – Trump Responds 

  • A federal judge on Monday dismissed President Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal.
  • Florida-based US District Judge Darrin Gayles, an Obama appointee, gave President Trump a chance to refile the lawsuit.
  • Trump’s legal team told Fox News that it will refile the lawsuit.
  • “President Trump will follow Judge Gayles’ ruling and guidance to refile this powerhouse lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and all of the other Defendants. The President will continue to hold accountable those who traffic in fake news to mislead the American people,” a spokesman for Trump’s legal team told Fox News Digital.
  • Fox News reported:

 

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: Atkinson Transcript Released Showing “Whistleblower” in Trump Impeachment Lied and Lying Schiff Buried It Until Today  

  • The “Whistleblower” in the first Trump Impeachment lied and Adam Schiff had it buried until Today.
  • This took six years, but we finally have it. Lying and disgusting Adam Schiff covered up a transcript from corrupt former Inspector General Atkinson, who testified that the BS “whistleblower” in the first bogus Trump impeachment was caught in a lie.  This was buried in the basement of the Capitol until today.
  • Adam Schiff buried the truth so that he could commit another coup against President Trump in their effort to remove him from power.

  • Where is the testimony from former and fired corrupt ICIG Atkinson that Adam Schiff hid in the Capitol basement?

Atkinson was identified in the FISA abuse report by the DOJ IG Horowitz as one of the individuals who was involved in FISA abuse, which provided President Trump cover for firing Atkinson:

But corrupt politicians like lying Adam Schiff, who pushed forward the unconstitutional and criminal impeachment of President Trump, were up in arms about the President’s action: 

 

Schiff was scared.  His actions related to President Trump’s impeachment were corrupt and horrendous.

 

Source: joehoft.com

 

  agenda.

 

  who thinks it’s OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon. I don’t want a Pope who thinks it’s terrible that America attacked Venezuela, a Country that was sending massive amounts of Drugs into the United States and, even worse, emptying their prisons, including murderers, drug dealers, and killers, into our Country. And I don’t want a Pope who criticizes the President of the United States because I’m doing exactly what I was elected, IN A LANDSLIDE, to do, setting Record Low Numbers in Crime, and creating the Greatest Stock Market in History. Leo should be thankful because, as everyone knows, he was a shocking surprise. He wasn’t on any list to be Pope, and was only put there by the Church because he was an American, and they thought that would be the best way to deal with President Donald J. Trump. If I wasn’t in the White House, Leo wouldn’t be in the Vatican. Unfortunately, Leo’s Weak on Crime, Weak on Nuclear Weapons, does not sit well with me, nor does the fact that he meets with Obama Sympathizers like David Axelrod, a LOSER from the Left, who is one of those who wanted churchgoers and clerics to be arrested. Leo should get his act together as Pope, use Common Sense, stop catering to the Radical Left, and focus on being a Great Pope, not a Politician. It’s hurting him very badly and, more importantly, it’s hurting the Catholic Church! President DONALD J. TRUMP

 

‘Blasphemous and pure evil’: Trump sparks outrage with image of himself as a Jesus-like healer

‘He’s been crystal clear from the beginning: he believes he’s doing the work God has set before him’ President Donald Trump is sparking outrage on his own Truth Social page after posting an image of himself healing a sick patient, with some claiming it’s “blasphemous” and “demonic” for what’s perceived as a comparison to Jesus.

Source: wnd.com

reference:

Trump took down the post

Why did Trump put this up and take it down, did he want the fake news to ask about it

Reporter:
Mr. President, did you post that picture of yourself depicted as Jesus Christ?

Trump:
Well, it wasn’t depicted—it was me. I did post it, and I thought it was me as a doctor and had to do with the Red Cross, as a Red Cross worker there, which we support. And only the fake news could come up with that one. So I had—I just heard about it, and I said, “How did they come up with that?” It’s supposed to be me as a doctor making people better. And I do make people better—I make people a lot better.

 

489

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 05b846 No.13359
US taxpayers are paying for it all.
Paris accord = scam (trillions)
Red Cross = scam (billions)
Foreign Aid = scam (trillions)
WAR = scam (trillions)
………on…and….on……..
Who audits where the money actually goes?
Who actually receives the money?
The US taxpayer is funding the very people we are engaged in taking down.
Slush funds everywhere.
Think GS pays for Antifa out of his own pocket?
The hole is deep.
Feel sick yet?

1249

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 5b3c72 No.1159482
>>1159198
Red Cross Iran.
Red Cross Pakistan.
Red Cross NK.
Red Cross ……..
Define smuggle.
What is smuggled?
What funds are used to pay for the goods?
These people are sick.
Relevant to events about to unfold.
Follow the EOs.
Q

The 17th Amendment Broke the Founders’ Balance of Power — And Washington Grew Far Beyond Its Constitutional Limits 

  • When the Founders designed the Constitution, they did something extraordinary.
  • They did not create a government based on a single stream of political power.
  • They created a system of balanced sources of authority, carefully structured so that no temporary political passion could easily overwhelm the rights of the people.
  • The House of Representatives was designed to reflect the will of the people directly.
  • The President was chosen by the Electoral College, ensuring that national leadership reflected both popular support and the union’s federal character.
  • And the Senate — critically — was designed to represent the states as sovereign political entities within the federal system.
  • Originally, United States Senators were chosen by state legislatures.
  • This was not a procedural technicality.
  • It was one of the Constitution’s central structural protections of liberty.
  • The Founders understood that political power must be divided not only among branches of government, but among different sources of consent.
  • The people would have their voice.
  • But the states — as political communities with their own interests, laws, and traditions — would have their voice as well.
  • The Senate was designed to ensure that the federal government remained a government of limited and delegated powers, not an engine of national consolidation.
  • James Madison explained the purpose clearly:
  • “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.” — Federalist No. 45
  • The Senate was a structural mechanism for preserving that balance.
  • And then, in 1913, the 17th Amendment changed everything.
  • The 17th Amendment Removed a Structural Protection Against Federal Overreach
  • The 17th Amendment shifted the selection of Senators from state legislatures to direct popular election.
  • On its surface, the change sounded democratic.
  • But structurally, it removed one of the Constitution’s most important checks on centralized power.
  • Before the 17th Amendment:
  • Senators answered to state legislatures
  • States had direct representation inside the federal government
  • Federal expansion could be resisted institutionally
  • State sovereignty had a permanent seat at the table
  • After the 17th Amendment:
  • Senators became national politicians
  • Campaign funding and media influence grew dominant
  • Senators became more responsive to national party pressures than to their states as sovereign entities
  • The states lost their direct structural defense inside the federal government
  • The change did not merely alter a voting method. It altered the architecture of power.
  • And over time, that architectural change has produced predictable results.
  • What Followed: Expansion of Federal Power Into State Domains
  • Without Senators accountable to state legislatures, the federal government gradually expanded its reach into areas traditionally governed by the states.
  • Among the commonly cited results:
  1. Expansion of federal regulation into state responsibilities
    Education standards, land use, environmental regulation, healthcare mandates, and labor rules increasingly originate in Washington rather than in state capitols.
  2. Growth of unfunded federal mandates
    Congress increasingly imposes requirements on states while leaving state taxpayers responsible for the cost.
  3. Increased dependence on federal funding
    Federal grants often come with conditions that influence state policy decisions, shifting practical control toward Washington.
  4. Centralization of policymaking authority
    Policy decisions affecting local communities are increasingly made by distant federal agencies rather than elected state officials.
  5. Weakening of federalism as a structural protection of liberty
    When states lose institutional influence inside the federal government, the balance of power shifts toward national consolidation.
  • The Founders did not design a system in which all major political decisions would flow through Washington.
  • They designed a system in which states would remain meaningful centers of political authority.
  • The 17th Amendment weakened that design.  And Washington grew.
  • The Founders Understood the Danger of Consolidated Power
  • Alexander Hamilton warned:
  • “Power over a man’s subsistence amounts to a power over his will.”  — Federalist No. 79
  • When political authority concentrates in a single national structure, citizens lose the protection that comes from multiple competing centers of power.
  • Federalism was never merely a technical arrangement.
  • It was a protection for liberty.
  • As George Mason warned:
  • “The powers of the general government being defined… the State governments retain all rights not expressly surrendered.”
  • The 17th Amendment blurred that boundary.
  • The Solution: Restore Structural Balance Through Constitutional Repair
  • The Constitution provides a lawful method for structural repair.
  • Article V allows the states to propose amendments through a Convention of States. This method totally bypasses Washington, D.C.
  • The Convention of States (https:\\conventionofstates.com) movement has gained significant traction across the country, with 20 states already passing resolutions calling for a convention to restore constitutional limits on federal power.
  • Among the reforms widely discussed:
  • Term limits for members of Congress
  • Fiscal restraints on federal spending
  • Limits on federal regulatory authority
  • Reassertion of state sovereignty
  • Repeal of the 17th Amendment
  • Authority for states to recall U.S. Senators who no longer represent their state’s interests
  • These reforms aim not at partisan advantage, but at restoring the constitutional balance that protects self-government.
  • A Senator who knows that his or her position depends upon the confidence of the state legislature — or can be recalled by the state — is far more likely to defend the constitutional role of the state within the federal system.
  • Structural incentives shape political behavior.
  • The Founders understood this. They designed accordingly.
  • Restoring Federalism Strengthens Self-Government
  • The issue is not whether citizens should vote.
  • Citizens already elect governors, legislators, attorneys general, and many other state officials.
  • The issue is whether the states, as sovereign political communities, retain a meaningful role in shaping federal policy.
  • Without structural protections for federalism, political power naturally centralizes.
  • When power centralizes, accountability weakens.
  • When accountability weakens, self-government erodes.
  • The Founders did not intend for the federal government to become the primary decision-maker for every major public question.
  • They designed a system in which authority would be divided, balanced, and restrained.  Because only then will We the People remain free and the true sovereigns of our nation.
  • The 17th Amendment altered that balance.
  • And the consequences have accumulated for more than a century.
  • Self-Government Requires Structural Integrity
  • Free societies do not survive by accident.
  • They survive when constitutional structures align incentives with accountability.
  • When those structures weaken, power flows toward concentration.
  • Restoring balance does not require revolution.
  • It requires repair.
  • The Constitution itself provides the means.
  • The Convention of States movement represents one path toward restoring the federal structure that protects liberty.
  • Repealing the 17th Amendment — or restoring the states’ ability to recall Senators — would reestablish one of the Founders’ most important safeguards against centralized political power.
  • The Founders built a system intended to preserve liberty across generations.
  • That system worked because it balanced power among competing institutions.
  • We can restore that balance. And we should.
  • Because self-government depends not only on voting —
  • But on maintaining the constitutional structures that prevent the consolidation of power, that shift of power away from the citizen and to a Washington elite.
  • The Founders did not assume the system would maintain itself automatically.
  • They assumed each generation would bear responsibility for preserving it.
  • Benjamin Franklin was asked what form of government had been created. He replied: “A republic, if you can keep it.”
  • Keeping it requires vigilance. Keeping it requires structural understanding. Keeping it requires the courage to repair what has been weakened.
  • The Constitution still provides the means. The question is whether we will act.
  • Steve Wolfer is a retired software designer and psychotherapist who has been a constitutional conservative and libertarian for over half a century.
  • The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of this publication.

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

3432

Jul 14, 2019 4:15:23 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 56c0a9 No. 7040112 
Jul 14, 2019 4:10:14 PM EDT

Anonymous ID: 5e7f2c No. 7040039 

This is not another 4 YEAR ELECTION…. “DRAIN THE SWAMP” does not simply refer to removal of those corrupt in DC…. GOD WINS

You May Also Like

[C] Before [D], It’s Getting Ready To Blow – Episode 1944

x22report

Drip, Drip, Prepped And Ready, Enjoy The Show – Episode 1945

x22report

Investigations By OIG Completed, Facts Dominate, [DS] Scrambles – Episode 1946

x22report