[DS] Trapped,Without Honest Election We Do Not Have A Country, It Had To Be This Way – Ep. 4028

SPREAD THE WORD

Watch The X22 Report On Video

pt>

[DS] Trapped,Without Honest Election We Do Not Have A Country, It Had To Be This Way
Click On Picture To See Larger Picture
The EU economies are feeling the inflation, the more they follow the [CB] agenda the worse it’s going to get, plus they are feeling the temporary energy shock. The [CB] believe they are safe, the midterms are won and now they released their control mechanisms on energy. Oil is dropping and gas will being to drop. Trump has set the stage for the new economic system. The [DS] went all out to gain control of the house and the senate. They cheated on a nationwide level, turning red states to blue because this is how desperate they are. They fell right into the trap. When the enemy is losing and they need to get back into power they do stupid things. Trump has warned them multiple times. It had to be this way so we can fix the elections in this country. The people must see it again. In the end Trump is still President and it will all work out.

 


Economy

Eurozone Inflation Hits 4% as ECB Prepares to Raise Rates Into a Stalling Economy

  • On 4 November, Eurostat said eurozone inflation rose to 4% in October from 3.8% in September, the highest reading since September 2023 and twice the European Central Bank’s 2% target. Energy did most of the damage, with prices up 20.8% in a year. Even that figure flatters the picture, because Germany’s rate fell only thanks to a fuel tax cut that runs until the end of the year. The next readings are likely to be worse.
  •  

Source:  europeanbusinessmagazine.com 

The ds , cb and foreign enemies believed they won, no need to keep the fuel prices high, Trump set everything up so they drop a lot lower than anyone expected

Oil drops, people shift their money, people believe d’s are in power they panic and put their money into gold and silver.

ADP Employment Report Signals Strong Labor Market Across The Board, Wage Growth Accelerates 

  • ADP’s Employment Report showed a better than expected rise in jobs in October, up 86k (vs +67k exp) – the 16th monthly rise in employment in a row…

“Employers of all sizes were hiring last month,” said Dr. Nela Richardson Chief Economist, ADP.

Richardson also noted that ADP data suggests that “job-changers were lured by a combination of bonuses, overtime, and more hours in addition to higher base pay.”

Source: zerohedge.com

 


President Trump’s Plan

 

 

  they don’t have. Trump being impeached by the House is more of a political stunt than anything of substance. Doesn’t mean shit if they can’t remove him. Trump has 2 years to do what he said he would do, and he either does it, or he doesn’t. That’s really all there is to it.

  are openly subverting our elections, and corrupt rogue judges are assisting them, all of which is part of a broader rebellion/insurrection/coup against the Trump administration. Military is the only way. Insurrection Act, declare th

e entire Democrat Party as unlawful enemy combatants in open rebellion, arrest the traitors, save the Republic, just like Lincoln. Until then, nothing changes

 But notice the difference. Arguing in court that an election was flawed is advocacy. The First Amendment protects it. What’s alleged here is something else: recruiting a retired teacher named Daniel J. Sullivan to sit on the ballot next to Sen. Dan S. Sullivan, so voters pick the wrong one. That’s not advocacy. It’s deception aimed at the voters themselves. And it isn’t just Republicans saying so. The New York Times reported that texts and documents tie the effort to the DSCC and its top law firm. Alaskans are voting today with both names on the ballot. Last week I said a fairly picked grand jury should hear this. We’re one step closer. Advocacy is protected. Fraud on voters is not. And here’s the apex point — Elias didn’t just, it seems, participate in picking the fake Dan Sullivan, he then entered as if he was an uninvolved legal advocate, riding both sides of the sapling. Hypocrisy and deception.

 

Did trump force them to concentrate everything in certain states

 

  that when the evidence drops. The American people will have “no doubt” about it. Mission accomplished. Does anybody really think Talafreako got the most democrat votes ever in Texas? Does anybody really think the democrats swept the state races in Texas? Did you see the huge ballot dumps for Abdul after midnight? They expected to steal it with a blue wave and it turned into a blue tsunami. Now the game moves from the polling precincts to the courtroom. Time to flip over the hand and show all the cards. Buckle up!

  flipped a blue seat. Florida will eventually become the template. Here’s how Florida protected it’s election system: (Brave search) SB 90 (signed May 2021) •Required voters to renew their vote-by-mail registration every election cycle(previously valid for four years) •Restricted ballot drop boxes to early-voting hours and required staffing •Banned third-party ballot collection(“ballot harvesting”); possessing more than two mail ballots became a crime •Required the last four digits of a Social Security or driver’s license number to register or request a mail ballot •Banned private/outside funding of election administration (the so-called “Zuckerbucks” ban) •Mandated hourly real-time turnout data on a statewide dashboard SB 524 (signed April 2022) •Created the Office of Election Crimes and Security (OECS), a 25-person unit under the Secretary of State, one of the first dedicated election-crime units in the nation •Made collecting more than two mail ballots a felony (previously a misdemeanor) •Required annual voter-roll cleanup(previously every two years) •Banned ranked-choice voting statewide •Raised fines for voter-registration violations from $1,000 to $50,000 Florida SAVE Act / HB 991 (signed April 2026) •Expanded citizenship verification at voter registration •Removed student ID as an acceptable form of voter identification •Tightened candidate qualification rules ———— Did you catch the important “safeguards” that protected against yesterday’s election steal? They centered around registration integrity, vote counting integrity and ballot integrity. And “student ID” is not valid to vote. Citizenship requirement to vote. This is all coming nationwide. But first you have to expose and prosecute the fraudulent election system officials to kick off the demand for a nationwide cleansing. I believe that is incoming.

 

  Election Fraud. But he says, of course, he will accept the results of the election because it’s been reported on the TV. “WHY WOULDN’T I?” He said he supported Paxton and he didn’t care for Cornyn. IS HE HINTING THIS IS A STING TO CATCH PEOPLE LIKE RINO CORNYN IN THE ACT OF ELECTION FRAUD? Watch and see.

  why is Fox Corp. spending so much money donating to the Worst of the Worst, including Hakeem Jeffries, Jamie Raskin, Ted Lieu, Pete Aguilar, the California Dumocratic Party, the Dumocratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Dumocratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the Congressional Black Caucus PAC, the CHC Bold PAC, and the New Dumocrat Coalition Action Fund, among others? No wonder FoxNews Ratings are collapsing, and they’re going to go down a lot further. They’re way down, not because of me, but because they are AGAINST me! This happened once before, and Fox almost collapsed. It’s happening again! President DONALD J. TRUMP

RECORD VIDEO ↓↓↓

TAKE A LISTEN

Image

 demeanor is off. Boss has something definitely cooking.

  voting, major problems with mail ballots, and offered a $1 million reward for tips leading to convictions. But those claims have not been directed at the 2026 midterm results since the polls closed yesterday. Not only that, but he’s been very presidential, magnanimous in the loss even, asserting he’d work with the other side to get things done. This is rather different than the authoritarian dictator fascist authoritarian king the left paints him as. Instead, he has positioned himself in a way that doesn’t match the monster the left claims he is. Optics matter, especially in a sting of this magnitude. What I suspect is that between now and Jan 20th, the entire landscape of what we thought happened changes dramatically. What we can do in the interim is act like we’ve been here before (we have), and hold the damn line. No way we hand our Republic back over to the globalist deep state that controls the Democrats without an accounting for what really happened behind the scenes.

 

He called it a “big deal” because early returns from a solidly Republican state can set the tone for election night. Trump had been heavily involved in Kentucky races—endorsing candidates such as Andy Barr for the open U.S. Senate seat (Mitch McConnell’s former seat) and several House candidates, and highlighting a large potential pharmaceutical manufacturing investment tied to Republican wins. Early strong GOP numbers there would be positive momentum.

Yes, most of them did—especially the high-profile ones.

Here’s the breakdown of the candidates Trump publicly endorsed in Kentucky:

  • Andy Barr (U.S. Senate): Won. He defeated Democrat Charles Booker roughly 55%–43% and will succeed Mitch McConnell. This was the biggest race in the state and a clear Republican hold.
    wlky.com
  • Ed Gallrein (KY-04 House): Won. He defeated Democrat Melissa Strange (about 53%) to succeed Thomas Massie, whom Trump had opposed in the primary.
    wlky.com
  • James Comer (KY-01), Brett Guthrie (KY-02), and Hal Rogers (KY-05): All incumbents won easily, as expected in their safe Republican districts.
  • Ralph Alvarado (KY-06 House): Lost. Democrat Zach Dembo flipped the open seat (formerly held by Barr) by a clear margin (around 53–55% for Dembo). This was the most competitive House race in the state and the main setback for Trump’s endorsed candidates there. 

Overall, Kentucky stayed solidly red at the federal level (Senate hold + 4 of 6 House seats for Republicans), with the KY-06 flip being the notable exception.  

 

All 50 states will conduct post-election audits of the 2026 midterms.

As of April 2026  every state has a post-election audit requirement in statute, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). These are standard, routine processes to check that voting equipment and counting procedures worked as intended— 

  • Traditional audits (most common): Required in 36 states + D.C. These typically involve randomly selecting a set percentage of precincts, machines, or ballots, hand-counting or inspecting the paper records, and comparing them to the machine totals.
  • Risk-limiting audits (RLAs): Statutorily required in 7 states. These use statistical sampling (with a predefined risk limit) so that larger samples are checked in closer races; the process can expand if needed.
  • Other/procedural: The remaining states use variations such as procedural checks, signature verification elements, or less strict/hybrid methods. Some states also allow or pilot RLAs as options.
     Most audits must finish before final certification (though 10 states do them afterward and a few do not specify a strict pre-certification deadline). Discrepancies can trigger expanded checks or hand counts in many places, but outcome-changing findings from standard audits are rare.
THUNE

Trump has made several positive statements about Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), calling him important to advancing the agenda and predicting success, though he has also criticized him (especially over the SAVE America Act and the filibuster).

Key positive statements

  • September 2026 (Republican midterm convention in Dallas): After the crowd booed at the mention of Thune, Trump defended him:
    “No, no. John is working hard. 
    He also said Senate Republicans overall would have “great, great success.” This came amid tensions over election legislation. 
  •  

Yes — states would still retain substantial ability to keep and enforce their own registration laws, especially for state and local elections.

The SAVE America Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) is a House-passed bill (February 2026, as an amendment to S. 1383 / related to H.R. 7296) that has not become law. It amends the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and Help America Vote Act (HAVA) to apply specifically to elections for Federal office.

No. The SAVE America Act would not stop the use of machines to count votes.

The SAVE America Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) is a bill focused on voter eligibility, not on how ballots are cast or counted. It would mainly require:

  • Documentary proof of U.S. citizenship (such as a passport or birth certificate + photo ID) to register or update registration for federal elections.
  • Photo ID to vote in person.
  • Identification requirements for mail/absentee ballots.

It does not ban voting machines, optical scanners, ballot-marking devices, or electronic tabulation. Those topics are not part of its core provisions.

  real challenge will be those who’ve been destroyed by this system losing hope. There are thousands of patriotic Americans that have been grounded up, lives destroyed by the previous admin and will be devastated knowing that the rigged elections have lasted another election. Even in Florida, while the turnout numbers were amazing, you will never convince me that the bitch that was rolling around on the floor of the state legislature and is DSA received that many votes for Senator.

Secretary Mullin’s comments about post-election review of “voting logs” and “registers” align with ongoing efforts to check participation against eligibility after votes are cast. DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel has opined that the Civil Rights Division can demand statewide voter lists under the Civil Rights Act of 1960 and share them with DHS/HSI for eligibility checks. Some states cooperate voluntarily; others have refused, leading to lawsuits (with mixed court results so far).

Executive orders have also directed DHS (with SSA and others) to compile and share citizenship-related lists with states to help with list maintenance.Key limitsElections are primarily run by the states under the Constitution. DHS cannot:

  • Directly administer elections, certify results, or unilaterally purge people from voter rolls (only states do that).
  • Access or seize ballots, machines, or full “voting logs” without proper legal process (warrants, subpoenas, or state cooperation).
  • Ignore privacy protections, the Voting Rights Act’s limits on intimidation, or court orders. A federal judge recently restricted certain HSI field operations in multiple states over concerns about flawed matching data and potential effects on voters. 

  destruction. If discovered, violations allow use of UCMJ authority long-vested with our Commander-in-Chief, justifying military intelligence, judge advocate general, tribunal processes and even force where necessary – depending on the established facts and the operation’s severity and effects. EO 13848 provides a mechanism to investigate and sanction foreign election interference. “Against all enemies, foreign and domestic. So help me God.”

 The order sets up an interagency process focused primarily on federal elections (with provisions for including relevant state/local information). A framework for consistent implementation was required within 30 days of the order (by mid-October 2018).

DNI Assessment (Section 1(a))

  1. Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), in consultation with appropriate agencies, must assess any information indicating that a foreign government (or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government) has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election.
    The assessment must identify, to the maximum extent possible, the nature of the interference, methods used, persons involved, and any foreign government(s) that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it.
    It is delivered to the President, Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, Attorney General, and Secretary of Homeland Security.
    Relevant agencies must promptly share information with the DNI. Later information can lead to amendments.

     
  2. Attorney General + DHS Report (Section 1(b))
    Within 45 days of receiving the DNI assessment, the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security (consulting other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, state and local officials) deliver a report to the President and the Secretaries of State, Treasury, and Defense.
    The report evaluates:

    • The extent to which any foreign interference targeting election infrastructure materially affected its security/integrity, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of results.
    • If interference targeted the infrastructure of (or pertaining to) a political organization, campaign, or candidate, the extent to which it materially affected security/integrity (including unauthorized access, disclosure or threatened disclosure, or alteration/falsification of information or data).
      It must note any material factual issues the AG and DHS cannot resolve or agree on, and include updates/recommendations on remedial actions (other than the sanctions in Sections 2–3).

       
  3. Targeted Sanctions by Treasury (Sections 2 and 3(a))
    After the Section 1 assessment and report, the Secretary of the Treasury reviews them and, in consultation with the Secretary of State, Attorney General, and Secretary of Homeland Security, imposes all appropriate sanctions under Section 2.
    Section 2 blocks all property and interests in property of designated foreign persons that are in the U.S., come within the U.S., or come within the possession/control of a U.S. person. Covered persons are those determined to have:

    • Directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or been complicit in foreign interference in a U.S. election;
    • Materially assisted, sponsored, or provided support for such activity or for blocked persons; or
    • Been owned/controlled by, or acted for/on behalf of, blocked persons.
      These are standard IEEPA blocking sanctions (implemented via OFAC; program identifier ELECTION-EO13848). The order also references and preserves authority under earlier cyber-related orders (EO 13694 as amended). Entry of sanctioned aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants is suspended. Sanctions require determinations and are not purely automatic from an allegation alone. 
  4. Broader Recommendations to the President (Section 3(b))
    The Secretaries of State and the Treasury (consulting other appropriate agencies) jointly prepare a recommendation to the President on whether additional sanctions against foreign persons may be appropriate, based on the identified interference and the Section 1(b) evaluation.
    This can include proposed sanctions on the largest business entities licensed or domiciled in a country whose government authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported the interference (at least one entity from each of: financial services, defense, energy, technology, and transportation—or comparable strategic sectors).
    Recommendations must assess effects on U.S. and allied economic/national security interests and be calibrated to the scope of the interference. Possible measures include property blocking, export license restrictions, financial transaction restrictions, equity/debt investment prohibitions, and other measures authorized by law. Final decisions on these broader measures rest with the President.

     

Key practical points

  • “Foreign interference” covers covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions (or attempts) by a foreign government or its agents with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result/reported result of an election, or undermining public confidence in processes/institutions. 
  • Election infrastructure includes IT/systems used by federal, state, or local government in managing elections (voter registration databases, voting machines, tabulation equipment, secure transmission systems, etc.).
  • The process emphasizes methodological consistency, protection of sources/methods, separation of intelligence from policy/legal judgments, insulation from political bias, and respect for free speech/open debate.
  • Assessments have occurred after elections (with some delays noted in practice); designations under the program appear on the OFAC SDN List.
  • The order builds on prior cyber sanctions authorities and is separate from ordinary domestic election administration laws.

 took a look at the deltas, 3 caught my eye. (All Dec 18 deltas worth a read!) I also recommend watching the entire episode this video clip is from. See quoted post.

  The ODNI finish their post-election assessment within the next 45 days, and DOJ/DHS finish their follow-up impact report within 45 days after the ODNI assessment. If the Trump admin were to find that foreign actors had any impact on the election, the evidence found by the Trump DOJ/DHS/ODNI can be used in federal lawsuits to contest the results of these elections, and/or bring charges against those who committed the fraud. All of this would fit in with the scenario the Dems have been warning about. Trump and his DOJ/DHS made it VERY clear they were watching the election, and that they were going to prosecute election/voter fraud. I’m not so sure the 2026 election story is completely written.

If the elections are not exposed and fixed, this will never end

  it… after everything we’ve been through, everything we’ve uncovered, and everything we’ve watched unfold over the last decade, people are tired… We want to see the fruits of that awakening… we want to know that the sacrifices, the sleepless nights, the broken relationships, and the years spent questioning everything they once believed have been leading somewhere… I understand that feeling deeply… yet something has changed within me over these past ten years… The longer I’ve observed these systems, the more I’ve learned to recognize how little any single event can reveal about the larger picture… We’ve watched narratives collapse, institutions expose their own contradictions, and developments that initially made little sense become clearer as additional pieces emerged… That journey changes how you process moments like last night… Part of me entertained the possibility of a red wave… I could see the ingredients for one, yet something kept tugging at me beneath the surface… there were still pieces moving, relationships shifting, legal mechanisms unfolding, and institutional preparations that hadn’t fully played out… So I went into election night without attaching my emotional well-being to the outcome… I checked the results a few times, watched the numbers come in, and felt something strangely familiar… on the surface, it looked like another painful chapter in a story we’ve been living for years… yet underneath, I couldn’t shake the feeling that the surrounding conditions had changed considerably… I’ve spent a long time mapping Trump’s positioning, the DOJ’s actions, federal oversight, election integrity, and the legal maneuvering surrounding the preservation of election records… those developments were already unfolding before anyone cast a ballot on November 3… Through it all, I kept coming back to the same place… I trust Trump… I trust the people he’s surrounded himself with… and more importantly, my faith has carried me through enough uncertainty to understand that I don’t need every answer the moment something happens… There’s a certain peace that comes from that… I went to bed without the dread that seems to have overtaken so many this morning, allowing the events to settle before examining how they fit into the larger system… Then something came rushing back to me… Muhammad Ali… Trump had been posting about Ali leading into the election, and something about those posts had been sitting in the back of my mind… This morning, as I began connecting his reaction to the results with everything already unfolding around him, the significance of Ali’s most famous strategy became impossible for me to ignore… The rope-a-dope… Suddenly, Trump’s congratulations, his distance from the losses, and his willingness to let his opponents enjoy their victory took on an entirely different meaning through the lens of systems dynamics… I found myself smiling… because after ten years of awakening, perhaps one of the greatest lessons has been learning to remain grounded when the world around us seems determined to pull us into fear… We’ve come too far to allow a single night to erase everything we’ve learned about patience, discernment, and the importance of seeing the whole system… I’ve pulled those connections together into something I believe deserves a much closer look. There’s a reason Muhammad Ali could lean against those ropes while everyone around him believed he was losing… He understood the fight was still unfolding… and this morning, that thought is sitting very comfortably with me… grab a coffee, take a few deep breaths… and read below…

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *