Jon Herold – Strategically Planned From The Beginning, Only At The Precipice Will People Demand Change

16 thoughts on “Jon Herold – Strategically Planned From The Beginning, Only At The Precipice Will People Demand Change

  • December 8, 2022 at 10:56 am

    Could it really be true that again, twenty-two
    Could be stolen just like twenty-twenty?
    Despite the explicit assurance of Q
    That security thence would be plenty
    To stop further fraud? Is there not something odd
    In the current deluge of disclosures?
    Arizona, Brazil, the Ukraine, Twitter’s plot,
    Then the President’s loss of composure?
    All coming at once, and on so many fronts,
    Not subject to being prevented,
    Then Trump says unheard-of electoral stunts
    Need remedies unprecedented?

  • December 8, 2022 at 11:13 am

    BULLSHIT, Dave, BULLSHIT! I’m listening to your discussion with Patel Patriot and I had to turn it off because you’ve pissed me off so much! You keep saying that, “the people aren’t ready for it yet.” Ready for what, Dave? I’ve sent you the solution so many times I’ve lost count and have never heard you speak about it – the federal government has NO authority/jurisdiction over the inhabitants of the 50, independent, sovereign states of the Union!! I will provide you with proof, once more, that We, the People, do not have to tolerate overreach by our police state, and I pray you will tell them or your program is nothing but whining hopium.

    Mike Neely

    (4 U.S.C. §72)

    “All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law.”

    This statute applies to “all” federal government offices and agencies. Congress has never enacted law granting its express, generic and blanket delegation of authority to the DOJ, FBI, IRS, ATF, TSA, CIA, DHS, NIH, CDC, Capitol Police or any other federal department or agency to be permanently active outside of Washington D.C. in the 50, several, sovereign states of the Union.

    Anyone, whether a federal employee or subcontractor, who goes into any of the several, 50 states of the Union and purports to represent and act on behalf of any federal governmental entity or subcontractor MUST furnish the identity of the federal department, office or agency they represent an ACT OF CONGRESS which “expressly” provides them with such authority/jurisdiction, and a Delegation of Authority from the President on down.

    “The CONGRESS SHALL HAVE POWER TO…EXERCISE EXCLUSIVE LEGISLATION in all Cases whatsoever, OVER SUCH DISTRICT (not exceeding ten Miles square) AS MAY, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, BECOME THE SEAT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, Dockyards, and other needful Buildings.” – U.S. Constitution, Art. 1, Sec. 8 (Emboldening, underlining, uppercasing added)

    PERIOD! Congress has “LIMITED” jurisdiction within the several, 50 states of the Union defined within the U.S. Constitution at Article I, Section 8 restricted to:

    1) Coining money and regulating the value thereof
    2) Regulating interstate commerce
    3) Providing for the defense of this country

    Congress has no “EXCLUSIVE” jurisdiction over us unless we are in Washington, D.C., federal buildings, forts, etc., the U.S. territories and possessions, and federally-owned lands. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in both U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222 (1949) and Foley Bros., Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 at 285 (1949) that:

    “LEGISLATION OF CONGRESS, unless a contrary intent appears, IS MEANT TO APPLY ONLY WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES [“territorial,” meaning Washington, D.C., federally-owned lands, buildings, forts, etc., and the U.S. possessions and territories].” (emboldening, uppercasing, enlargement, bracketed section added)

    SCOTUS also ruled in Caha v. U.S., 152 U.S. 211 at 215 (1894):

    “THE LAWS OF CONGRESS in respect to those matters [outside of Constitutionally delegated powers] DO NOT EXTEND INTO THE TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF THE STATES [the several, 50, states of the Union] but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government [i.e. federally-owned lands, buildings, forts, etc.,
    and the U.S. possessions and territories].” (emboldening, uppercasing, enlargement, bracketed sections added)

    Since Congress (Legislative Branch) does have exclusive jurisdiction and authority to create law for the United States (District of Columbia) and the territories and insular possessions, exceptions to the mandate of 4 U.S.C. §72 shall be found only in United States law (statutes) and not in Regulations or presidential executive orders (Executive Branch), nor even in Supreme Court rulings (Judicial Branch).

    4 U.S.C. §72, which is positive law, mandates that ALL offices of government are restricted to “the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere” unless Congress “expressly” extends their granted authority to other geographical areas by United States law. ALL offices attached to the seat of government are contemplated in this law and not just some offices.

    The provisions of 4 U.S.C. §72 are mandatory by the insertion of the word, “shall,” by Congress. In other words, this is not an optional consideration for any United States officer, Court, or Agency. The “exercise” of ALL government offices is by default limited to “the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere.”

    The term, “expressly,” in 4 U.S.C. §72 means that when Congress extends the authority of any office or officer of the United States outside “the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere,” Congress will do it by “expressly” extending such authority and by leaving no doubt that said authority has been “expressly” extended by Congress to a particular geographical area outside “the District of Columbia.” The definition of “expressly” from Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed. is as follows:

    “In an express manner; in direct and unmistakable terms; explicitly; definitely; directly. The opposite of impliedly.'” (emboldening added)

    An exception can be made to the “the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere” limitation. As set forth in 4 U.S.C. §72, authority to act outside “the District of Columbia” must be “otherwise expressly provided by law.” This means that if Congress intends to extend the authority of a particular department, office, or agency of the United States to areas outside “the District of Columbia” it shall “expressly” delegate, grant, and extend said authority in United States LAW. U.S. “law” consists of a legislatively enacted “statute” and corresponding, implementing “regulation.” It MUST have BOTH. One without the other does not have the force and effect of law, and the regulation cannot be broader than the statute which is the “meat and potatoes.”

    Any exception to the limitations of 4 U.S.C. §72 is to be authorized “expressly” by Congress, ONLY, in United States “law,” and ONLY Congress, by United States law, can authorize, grant or extend the authority of any government office outside “the District of Columbia,” pursuant to 4 U.S.C. §72. The U.S. Supreme Court agrees:

    “Official powers cannot be extended beyond the terms and necessary implications of the grant. If broader powers be desirable, they must be conferred by Congress.” – Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co., 283, U.S. 643, 51 S.Ct. 587 (1931) (emboldening added)

    The Courts, even the U.S. Supreme Court, are NOT empowered to extend the authority of any government department, office, agency to any place other than “the District of Columbia”

    The United States government is a “corporation.” Title 28, United States Code (the Judicial Code) at Section 3002(15) states:

    (15) “United States” means –
    (A) a Federal CORPORATION;
    (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other
    entity of the United States; or
    (C) an instrumentality of the United States. (emboldening,
    uppercasing, enlargement added)

    Therefore, “THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IS A FOREIGN CORPORATION WITH RESPECT TO A STATE.” (Vol. 20: Corpus Juris Secundum. (p. 1785: NY Re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct. 1973, 41 L.Ed 287.) (emboldening, uppercasing, enlargement added)

    The offices associated with the seat of government are foreign to the several, 50 states and this is precisely why the jurisdiction of the United States is restricted to “the District of Columbia and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law.”

    The location of “United States,” as defined by law, further confirms that the authority of the Secretary is restricted to “the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere.” The Uniform Commercial Code at section 9-307 (h) states: “The United States is located in the District of Columbia.”

    This exact provision is reflected in various state codes, including, but not limited to California (Cal. Commercial Code 9307(h)) and Texas (Texas Business and Commercial Code Section 9.307(h).

    Federal STATUTES and REGULATIONS have no general applicability and lawful effect on the inhabitants of the 50, several, sovereign states of the Union. (We just think they do and unfortunately, of course, go along with them out of fear of police state actions.)

    ADDITIONAL RELEVANT AUTHORITY CITES (emboldening, underlining, uppercasing, and enlargement are added unless otherwise noted):

    Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 86 (1906)
    “The corporation of which the petitioner was an officer was chartered by a state, and over it THE GENERAL [federal] GOVERNMENT HAS NO MORE CONTROL THAN OVER AN INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN OF THAT STATE.
    “THE NATIONAL [federal] GOVERNMENT HAS JURISDICTION over crimes committed WITHIN ITS SPECIAL TERRITORIAL LIMITS [“territorial” meaning Washington, D.C., federally-owned lands, buildings, forts, etc., and the U.S. territories]…” (bracketed words added)

    Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U.S. 238, 295 (1936)
    “It is no longer open to question that THE GENERAL [federal] GOVERNMENT, unlike the states, Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251, 275, POSSESSES NO INHERENT POWER IN RESPECT OF THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF THE STATES, AND EMPHATICALLY NOT WITH REGARD TO LEGISLATION.” (bracketed word added)

    U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222 (1949)
    “[There is a] canon of construction which teaches that LEGISLATION OF CONGRESS, unless a contrary intent appears, IS MEANT TO APPLY ONLY WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES [“territorial” meaning Washington, D.C., federally-owned lands, buildings, forts, etc., and the U.S. territories].” (bracketed words added)

    New York vs. United States, 91-543, 505 U.S. 144 at 188 (1992)

    Bond v. U.S., No. 09–1227, 564 U.S. 211 (2011)
    “Federalism also protects the liberty of all persons within a State by ensuring that LAWS ENACTED IN EXCESS OF DELEGATED GOVERNMENTAL POWER CANNOT DIRECT OR CONTROL THEIR ACTIONS…federalism protects the liberty of the individual from arbitrary power.
    “AN INDIVIDUAL HAS A DIRECT INTEREST IN OBJECTING TO LAWS THAT UPSET THE CONSTITUTIONAL BALANCE BETWEEN THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT AND THE STATES when the enforcement of those laws causes injury that is concrete, particular, and redressable.

  • December 8, 2022 at 12:28 pm

    Dave, you keep saying the people need to do something to let the military know the people are pissed off and we want the military to take control of our country and remove the fake Biden administration. Just how do the Patriots let the military know the people are pissed off and we have had enough? The Patriots go out in the streets and protest, then the Proud Boys, the fbi, and antifa join in and start burning buildings and hurting the Patriots and then the Patriots are arrested like during January 6th. Some of those Trump supporters are still in jail and are being treated horribly in that DC jail. How is that going to help our current situation. It’s Not! I know several Patriots who are losing hope that Trump and the military are going to take our country back from the deep state. Patriots including myself are battling depression and anxieties. Patriots are struggling to pay their rent and put food on their tables. Three men that I used to work with have become homeless. Do you think the Patriots are enjoying the B’s we are being forced to live through? I am a 68 year old senior citizen who is struggling to live on Social Security. Forty seven years ago I was run-over and drug for a block underneath the car by a drunk driver. The hospital called my parents and told them I wasn’t going to survive from my injuries. Well not only did I live, I worked 42 years after that accident. But now I am no longer able to work. I don’t own a car. So I have to walk everywhere I need to go or ride the bus if it is running. If I wasn’t receiving help from Eldorado County Health and Human Services I wouldn’t have food to eat and I wouldn’t have health insurance. Nor would I be able to pay my rent. I am not suicidal Dave but I recently prayed to God telling Him that I didn’t want to live in the screwed up world I was living in anymore, that I wanted to go to Heaven and live with God. Now does that sound like I am at the Precipus? I hate the world we are living in right now. I hate the deep state system that is running our country. I hate the fake Joe Biden administration. You do know that the real Joe Biden has been dead since 2018 and there has been 3 different actors playing Joe Biden? Literally! Why doesn’t someone, some Patriot do a survey to find out how many people would like the military to remove the Biden administration and return Trump as our duly elected President? People are committing suicide. Do you think for a minute that people are not sick and fed up with what the deep state is forcing us to live through? I have Patriot neighbors who are depressed and losing hope. How in the hell can we let the military know we are sick of this shit and we want the military to remove the corrupt, illegal, illegitimate Biden administration and return our duly legal elected President Trump back in as our US President? I am ready to join a civil war. I will assuredly be killed but at least I would die fighting for my freedoms.

  • December 8, 2022 at 12:53 pm

    Who tainted the vaccine? Was it’s side effects known or even intentional! Weren’t we all taught that vaccines are a good thing?

  • December 8, 2022 at 5:40 pm

    U DUMB CUNT! THE PEOPLE THATS AWAKE AS MUCH AS THEY WILL EVER BE! Most liberals & ALL media will justify it no matter if they are about to get their head cut off😡U keep on saying “WAITING ON PEOPLE TO WAKE UP”! THIS IS ALL IT IS. U use that as excuse to continue to use this Q mess! IF we take to the streets then u say no good.He already know the majority of voters voted for him in 2020. It never can or will be 100%.. More evidence as I’ve said It’s no coming back because they will only get worse! Oath means nothing to traitors. U all have many chances to interview Trump about Q & refused! Not reveal tactics but broadly talk about it & it’s in action. ITS NOT IN ACTION & THATS WHY HE CANT TALK ABOUT IT! Don’t u understand if this Q bull💩 is True ALL of the criminals, army, cia, fbi criminals are way ahead of them🤦🏻but instead the politicians still are committing crimes! If u know about this secret these others have known many years b4 u! They are still wide open with treason which means NOTHING good is going on. Bush & osluma made sure all the powerful patriots were replaced with communist. ITS ONLY COMMON SENSE🤷🏻‍♂️UNLESS U CAN GET SOMEONE IMPORTANT ON UR SHOW (u can’t) to admit it’s a military operation going on then u should stop misleading the people!

  • December 8, 2022 at 5:44 pm

    People won’t go out and protest. They remember the Jan. 6. I won’t..I can’t go to jail. I’d die first.

  • December 8, 2022 at 5:44 pm

    People won’t go out and protest. They remember the Jan. 6. I won’t..I can’t go to jail. I’d die first. I never said this before

  • December 8, 2022 at 6:06 pm

    Why does this guest keep changing his name? He used to go by Dustin Nemos & he trashed Trump over & over again. Now, he pops up with another name? Controlled opposition. Won’t ever listen to him again.

  • December 8, 2022 at 7:19 pm

    The January 6th arrests have cause fear in people to protest and demand action in my opinion. Plus I think people assume our government is set up to solve any problems and they won’t need to worry about doing anything.
    They have now said they want the Kushner tax returns which is President Trumps family.

  • December 9, 2022 at 11:43 am

    What about all the people that are awake but can’t pay their bills and feul? How about stop the government funding of all the liberals that don’t work and suck of the government. Because the liberals are either rich or fundedby the government . So make them uncomfortable. It’s so disheartening that most of the people that are awake can’t pay their bills.

  • December 10, 2022 at 4:45 pm

    Re: Q 1832 – I think you are correct, Trump is turning everything on them. Remember THINK MIRROR posts. Q 1953
    Think MIRROR.
    Know your enemy.
    “Every battle is won before it’s ever fought.”
    Knowledge is POWER.

  • December 10, 2022 at 5:52 pm

    Jon didn’t believe in the Q Project. Thought it was a hoax. He poo-pooed many in the fight including you Dave. He’s more of an attention seeker. Much of what he says is like duh.

  • December 10, 2022 at 6:08 pm

    Trump coming back before the Mid Terms was a pipe dream. WE are in the Great Awakening. He needed the cheating to be obvious so the people/normies will wake up. Jon is right that Trump needs us to get off our asses and demand change. The Storm is not far off. Sooner WE demand change the sooner it will happen.

  • December 11, 2022 at 9:10 am

    If the fraud is substantial enough, especially if foreign powers were involved, I suspect that posse comitatus could be suspended and the military can run the country until it is all sorted out.

  • December 13, 2022 at 8:58 am

    I liked the interview with John “Patel Patriot”. Very informative but I do have one critique… he said he didn’t like all of the “in-fighting” amongst truthers, to which you agreed with his POV; however, I disagree and it’s mostly due to what Jordan Sather brings to the party. He has exposed several “digital soldiers” for being scammers. I believe that is also important to expose so that others, like me, who now primarily get our information from “truth channels” (like yours) can sharpen our discernment to separate fact from fiction. I know Jordan rubs some others the wrong way but that’s a good thing because it forces us to look into things further rather than just “believe” what is being said by the likes of say a Charlie Ward or Simon Parkes and that ilk.

    After all, we are in an “information war” and if people like them are not exposed, how then does one know who the “real truthers” are if it weren’t for the work that Jordan brings to the table? Hopefully, this is a point that John can appreciate and not be dismissive of, as some of us now turn to “truth channels” for up to date information, such as your channel and his.

    I appreciate all that you do and how you do it, and what he also does. Thank you for your dedication and attention to detail backed up with verifiable information and where to investigate further. Those others (named previously and a handful of others [Phil “Fraudlewski”, SG Anon, Jako, etc.], need to be exposed so that truthers like you, John, and Jordan have a fighting chance of being considered “legitimate”. As Jordan is fond of saying, “Show me the sauce.” Which is something those others don’t do…

    Thanks again for all that you do. It is appreciated.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *