Did Barr/Durham Meet An Important Person?, Next Wave Coming – Episode 2014

Barr/Durham Called In An Important Person, Next Wave Coming
Click On Picture To See Larger Picture

BJ has planned the BREXIT perfectly, he has the EU and the elite exactly where he wants them, within the plan there is a trap door clause and the wording in the plan allows BJ to trade with other countries. The US economy has doing better than ever. Texas just passed a bill to get rid of state income tax, it is now time TF says to get rid of the federal income tax. The [DS] impeachment plan with their secret hearings is now falling apart rapidly, as they [DS] releases these transcripts we are finding that there is nothing, there is no there, there. Trump countered all of this with the release of the phone transcript, the [DS] is following their script because they don’t have another plan. Barr and Durham had someone very interesting visit them, does this have to with Assange, the investigation, it starting to look like it. DOJ case against Flynn is now falling apart, SP cornered the operatives, they are trapped by their own doing. The patriots are controlling it all, the [DS] is doing exactly what they want them to do.

Check Out The X22 Report Spotlight YouTube Channel X22Report Spotlight

Please check Newzsentinel.com for the latest news on the economic collapse. The Sentinel Alerts are updated throughout the day. If you haven’t already, go to “The People” and join the community of people who are helping each through the economic collapse.

Current News – 11.06.2019

Watch The X22 Report On Video


  Johnson’s Brexit Deal Has A Trap Door Clause

Differences Between Johnson’s Deal and Theresa May’s Deal

Customs Union

This is the big one. Under Johnson’s deal the U.K. will leave the EU’s customs union, allowing it to strike its own trade deals with other countries. Under May’s proposals the country would have stayed inat least until it had reached a free trade agreement with the EU — preserving trade ties built up over its 46-year membership of the bloc and its predecessors.

 Point 8 is not true

Level Playing Field on EU Rules

Johnson wants to give himself greater room to diverge from EU rules on, for example, social and environmental standards — 

May’s Deal: The future relationship must ensure open and fair competition. Provisions to ensure this should cover state aid, competition, social and employment standards, environmental standards, climate change, and relevant tax matters, building on the level playing field arrangements provided for in the Withdrawal Agreement and commensurate with the overall economic relationship.

Johnson’s Deal: The precise nature of commitments should be commensurate with the scope and depth of the future relationship and the economic connectedness of the Parties.

The political statement says “The Parties should in particular maintain a robust and comprehensive framework for competition and state aid control that prevents undue distortion of trade and competition; commit to the principles of good governance in the area of taxation and to the curbing of harmful tax practices; and maintain environmental, social and employment standards at the current high levels provided by the existing common standards.”

 , the political declaration is just that — a statement of intent rather than a binding commitment.

EU law will apply in the transition period

After we leave the EU, we will go into limbo, known in the bill as the implementation period (IP), although everyone calls it the transition period, which lasts until December 2020.

During this period nothing will change, except that the UK will no longer be a member of the EU. The bill makes this explicit: the European Communities Act, which puts the obligations of membership in British law, will continue to apply.

Parliament will have a say over trade deal negotiations

The bill gives parliament control of the negotiating mandate for the long-term trade deal with the EU (the “future relationship” in the jargon). It says ministers may not engage in negotiations unless a statement of objectives has been approved by the House of Commons, and that ministers “must seek to achieve” those objectives.

‘Parliamentary Sovereignty’ Clause

That portion sounds ominous. But Johnson negotiated a pair of escape clauses.

The bill includes a clause that begins: “It is recognised that the parliament of the United Kingdom is sovereign.” This is persiflage designed to keep the sillier Eurosceptics happy. They do not like the continuing application of EU law during the transition period, or the eight-year phase-out of European Court of Justice jurisdiction over some EU citizenship questions.

Trap Door Clause

The bill gives parliament a say if the UK government decides to ask for an extension. But many MPs are worried that Boris Johnson wouldn’t ask for one, opening a “trapdoor” to a delayed no-deal Brexit if there is no trade deal with the EU in place by the end of 2020.

If Johnson does not like the negotiations, at the end of 2020 he can walk away with No Deal, more accurately, a WTO Deal.

 Walking Away

Amendments to get rid of the Trap Door failed. In fact, the WA was never approved. If Johnson’s deal is approved, it will still contain the Trap Door.

  Johnson could still opt for a WTO Brexit if the EU will not cooperate.

Source: moneymaven.io/mishtalk



Source: news.yahoo.com

DOW Reaches 109th All-Time High Since 2016 Election – Obama and Bush Had NONE in their Entire First Term!

  • The markets again are reaching new highs.  The DOW closed at another all-time high yesterday.  This is the 109th all-time high since the 2016 election and 109 more all-time highs than the two previous Presidents reached in their entire first terms.

  • President Trump’s first year in office (2017) saw the most all-time stock market closing highs (71) as well as the largest increase in DOW history (4,956 points) in history.
  • President Trump has now increased the markets by more than any other President in their entire Presidency (when counting from their election win to the election day of their last year in office.)
  • All the major indices are way up under President Trump and many records have been set. The market increases since President Trump’s election are historic.

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

And then we have this

Tom Fitton responds



REPORT: Former Ukrainian Official Accuses Hunter Biden of Taking “Off the Books” Payments from Burisma Totaling Millions

  • New memos released this week reveal Burisma Holdings, Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian natural gas company pressured the Obama State Department to help end the corruption investigation during the 2016 election cycle just one month before then-Vice President Joe Biden forced Ukraine to fire Viktor Shokin, the prosecutor probing his son Hunter.
  • Now we have this
  • According to former Ukrainian official Oleksandr Onyshchenko Hunter Biden was receiving “off the books” payments from Burisma in the millions.
  • Via DC Media:

 “There were ‘official’ and ‘unofficial’ payments to the Biden family,” Onyshchenko stated.

Onyshchenko also confirmed that former FBI agent Karen Greenway, who oversaw the Obama administration’s anti-corruption efforts in Eastern Europe, directed the coverup of the Biden scandal at the time, in concert with the U.S. embassy in Kyiv, and other Deep State American government assets ‘in-country’.

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

The MSM/DS players are now saying that Sondland, who changed his testimony, who lied to congress, lied to the American people just proved quid pro quo

Fact Check: No, Gordon Sondland Did Not Prove Ukraine ‘Quid pro Quo’

  • This is false Sondland said that he “presumed” there was a “quid pro quo.” But he did not have any first-hand knowledge of one, and other witnesses have testified that there was no such “quid pro quo” at all.
  • In a supplemental declaration filed with the committee, Sondland said that “by the beginning of September 2019, and in the absence of any credible explanation for the suspension of aid,” he “presumed that the [Ukraine] aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anti-corruption statement” and the investigation of the Bidens. That led him to tell the Ukrainian government that “resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur” until it complied.
  • But there are two big logical leaps in Sondland’s statement.
  • The first is that he only “presumed” there was a “quid pro quo” — that is, he did not have direct knowledge of one.
  • The second is that he told the Ukrainians that a “quid pro quo” was “likely” — that is, he did not know with certainty.
  • In their rush to accuse the Trump administration of wrongdoing, Democrats and the media have overlooked one other key fact:  , “Trump holds up Ukraine military aid meant to confront Russia,” dated August 28, was the first that the Ukrainians ever knew about any withholding of aid — five weeks after the phone call between Trump and Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky which supposedly prompted the so-called “whistleblower” to approach Rep. Adam Schiff  
  • Therefore what changed his — and others’ — impression was not anything the administration (or its representatives) did or said. Rather, it was the media.

Source: breitbart.com

Sondland is now repeating hearsay and 2nd hand accounts, he has no proof, he said it in his testimony. Plus he lied, so who is going to believe him now, sounds just like cohen. 

Now William Taylors transcript was released

Testimony Transcript Shows William Taylor Never Talked To Trump, Wasn’t Even On July 25 Phone Call

  • William Taylor admitted he wasn’t on the July 25 phone call and had never even spoken with Trump about Ukraine military aid.
  • William Taylor,  told lawmakers in secret testimony two weeks ago that his opinions about an alleged quid pro quo demanded by Trump were formed largely from conversations with anti-Trump staffers within the diplomatic bureaucracy.
  • Here is part of the transcript
  • “[Y]ou’ve never spoken to Mr. [Rudy] Giuliani?” Taylor was asked.
  • “No, no,” he replied.
  • “Has anyone ever asked you to speak to Mr. Giuliani?”
  • “No,” Taylor said.
  • “And if I may, have you spoken to the president of the United States?” Taylor was asked.
  • “I have not,” he said.
  • “You had no communications with the president of the United States?”
  • “Correct,” Taylor said.
  • He also admitted he had never spoken to Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s chief of staff.
  • When asked who exactly he had spoken to about the brouhaha, Taylor confirmed that his only contacts about the matter were with John Bolton, the former national security adviser who was fired by Trump, Fiona Hill, Alexander Vindman, and Tim Morrison.
  • Taylor also testified that his knowledge of the phone call between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymr Zelensky wasn’t first-hand knowledge.
  • “And this isn’t firsthand. It’s not secondhand. It’s not thirdhand,” Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., said to Taylor. “But if I understand this correctly, you’re telling us that Tim Morrison told you that Ambassador Sondland told him that the president told Ambassador Sondland that Zelensky would have to open an investigation into Biden?”
  • “That’s correct,” Taylor admitted.

Source: thefederatlist.com

Since the secret hearings are going really well for Schiff and Pelosi, they are still following the script, it says we need to let the American people see how Trump committed quid pro quo, remember they expected the transcript to be released, this is why the entire fake impeachment is not working, but following the script, it is only going to help the patriots. 

Schiff Announces Impeachment Hearing Schedule. Here’s Who Will Testify

  • House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff announced   that three diplomats will testify next week as part of the first wave of open hearings in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.
  • Schiff announced on Twitter that William Taylor, the acting ambassador to Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian affairs, will testify in a public hearing next Wednesday, Nov. 13
  • Marie Yovanovitch, a State Department official who preceded Taylor as ambassador to Ukraine, will testify on Nov. 15.
  • Don’t worry it is all scripted

Source: dailycaller.com

the DS is now panicking, because the whistleblower’s identity is being threatened. Take a listen to NP and what she had to say about the WB

Trump tweeted the following

The DS panicking about the WB identity being released to public, AS is now

 Adam Schiff Threatening Ethics Complaint Against Staffer Who Leaked Name of Whistleblower 


  • But Adam Schiff does not like it when other people leak. He won’t stand for it.

Other DS players are now trying to stop the identity of the WB from being revealed.  Paul Sperry tweeted out the following

So Don Jr decided to do just that, he outed the WB, he was responding to an article from Breitbart, the title is – Alleged ‘Whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella Worked Closely with Anti-Trump Dossier Hoaxer

Paul Sperry tweeted out the following

Then back in 2017, Mark Zaid, the WB attorney tweeted a message that is very similar to Strzok and page texts. 

Whistleblower’s Attorney Mark Zaid on Trump: “We Will Get Rid of Him” and “We’ll Be Great Again Once Trump Leaves”

  • Mark Zaid,   tweeted in 2017 that “we will get rid of” President Trump.

Via Mr. Dirt.

Also Zaid tweeted… “We’ll be great again when @realDonaldTrump leaves.”

Source: thegatewaypundit.com


Volker and Sondland Testimony Released – And Elise Stefanik, Once Again, On the Right Trail…

  • What is happening now with Adam Schiff and Daniel Goldman, was designed last year.  The current HPSCI legislative impeachment process, and every little aspect within it, is the execution of a plan, just like the DOJ/FBI plan was before it.
  • The use of a ‘whistle-blower’ was pre-planned long ago.  The agreements between Schiff, Lawfare and the CIA ‘whistle-blower’ were pre-planned.  The changing of whistle-blower rules to assist the plan was designed long ago.
  • Adam Schiff and Daniel Goldman are executing a plan concocted long ago. None of the testimony is organic; all of it was planned a long time ago, long before anyone knew the names Marie Yovanovitch, Kurt Volker, Gordon Sondland or Bill Taylor.   All of this is the coordinated execution of a plan.
  • When Bill Taylor is texting Gordon Sondland about a quid-pro-quo, and Sondland is reacting with ‘wtf are you talking about’, Taylor was texting by design.  He was manufacturing evidence for the narrative.  This was all a set-up. All planned.
  • When Marie Yovanovitch shows up to give her HPSCI deposition to Daniel Goldman with three high-priced DC lawyers: Lawrence Robbins, Laurie Rubenstein and Rachel Li Wai Suen, having just sent her statements to the Washington Post for deployment immediately prior to her appearance, Yovanovitch is doing so by design.  All planned.

Source: theconservativetreehouse.com

Since the quid pro quo is not going anywhere the DS/MSM does what it does best, just like when Russian collusion wasn’t going their way they switched, to racists, then to obstruction now, since quid pro quo was countered by the release of the actual phone transcript, they are swithcing to Extortion and Bribery, another big fail. 

Desperate Dems Drop ‘Quid Pro Quo’ Rhetoric, Now It’s ‘Extortion’ And ‘Bribery’ 



“We keep using the word quid pro quo, but the accurate word here is bribery and extortion. Those are criminal charges.” @RepGaramendi reacts to Gordon Sondland’s revised impeachment inquiry testimony. http://cnn.it/2NKNwLr 

Embedded video

Source: thefederalist.com

Mitch McConnell lets everyone know that what NP and AS are doing is not working

Mitch McConnell: If Trump Impeachment Trial Were Held Today ‘It Would Not Lead To A Removal’

  •  Mitch McConnell said   the Senate would acquit President Donald Trump if the impeachment trial were held today.
  • I will say I’m pretty sure how it’s likely to end,”  “If it were today I don’t think there’s any question — it would not lead to a removal.  

Source: dailycaller.com

What we are watching is famous wrap up smear tactic

According to NP this is how its done:

1. accuser passes false accusation to partisan media.
2. partisan media blasts out accusation.
3. original accuser reports “others are reporting the same”.
4. repeat

DOJ Makes Jaw-Dropping Admission in Flynn Case – Prosecution “Mistakenly” Attributed Wrong Notes to Wrong FBI Agents….

  •  Prosecutor Brandon Van Grack sends a letter to Flynn’s defense team today containing a stunning, almost impossible to comprehend, admission of a mistake central to the claims of the prosecution.  In March 2018 the FBI presented notes taken by agents Pientka and Strzok, now they say they made a ‘mistake’.
  • For almost two years the DOJ misidentified, misattributed, and never corrected that the authors of the Flynn interview notes were actually reversed.  All of the notes attributed to FBI Agent Peter Strzok actually were taken by FBI Agent Joseph Pientka, and vice-versa:


  •   The DOJ never confirmed the authorship of the FBI notes that are central to the FD-302, upon which the entire prosecution claim of Flynn lying to investigators is based? …Seriously?
  • The entire FBI case against Flynn; meaning the central element that he lied to FBI investigators (he didn’t); is predicated on the FD-302 interview reports generated by the two FBI agents; later discovered to have been edited, shaped and approved by Andrew McCabe….  And for almost two years the entire outline of their documented evidence has been misattributed?
  • Anyone believing this 
Source: theconservativetreehouse.com
Ret FBI Agent Linda Rarey explains with a tweet

Sidney Powell repsonded

Curiouser and Curiouser…

  • According to several media reports AG Bill Barr is scheduled to have a meeting today with Senator Lindsey Graham for an update on the Horowitz and Durham investigations:

[…] Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, plans to meet Wednesday with Barr to talk about the report’s planned rollout 

  • Then, moments ago, this little innocuous sighting popped up amid the DC media:

  •  coincidence 
  • According to recent reports U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr are spending time on a narrowed focus looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election.  
  • We also know specifically that John Durham is looking at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This is important because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks.
  • Remember Dana Rohrabacher interviewed,   Julian Assange 
  •  The $64,000 dollar question is: will they say so publicly?

Source: theconservativetreehouse.com

As new know Project Veritas released the undercover story that had to to with ABC and amy robach, James O’Keefe was surprised she retweeted it, then this happened.

Now down at the border

Geopolitical/Police State

Trump Cuts Federal Money for ‘Cultural Exchange’ with Cuba, Russia, North Korea

  • President Donald Trump announced in a Monday Federal Registry statement that the federal government could no longer use taxpayers’ dollars for “educational and cultural exchange programs” partnered with the governments of Cuba, Russia, Syria, and North Korea.
  • The decree, handed down in a formal “Presidential Determination,” is a response to these countries’ egregious human trafficking abuses, or negligence in prosecuting criminals trafficking people in their country. The State Department has designated all four countries “Tier 3” countries for significant risk of human trafficking crimes, which allows the president to unilaterally restrict non-humanitarian aid at his discretion.
  • President Trump’s announcement limits funding through 2020, or until the governments on the list prove they have cracked down on human trafficking.

Source: breitbart.com


Syria: OPCW Whistleblowers Confirm What We Already Knew. The OPCW Suppressed Evidence Regarding alleged Chemical Weapons Attack

  • Whistleblowers have come forward revealing what many had known all along – that the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had deliberately altered various reports and suppressed evidence regarding alleged chemical weapon attacks in Syria to help bolster US war propaganda.
  • The Courage Foundation – comprised of various whistleblowers and investigative journalists – in a statement titled, “Panel Criticizes ‘Unacceptable Practices’ in the OPCW’s investigation of the Alleged Chemical Attack in Douma, Syria on April 7th 2018,” would conclude (emphasis added):

Based on the whistleblower’s extensive presentation, including internal emails, text exchanges and suppressed draft reports, we are unanimous in expressing our alarm over unacceptable practices in the investigation of the alleged chemical attack in Douma, near the Syrian capital of Damascus on 7 April 2018. We became convinced by the testimony that key information about chemical analyses, toxicology consultations, ballistics studies, and witness testimonies was suppressed, ostensibly to favor a preordained conclusion.

Source: globalresearch.ca