Reports 

Don Tzu Doing The Opposite Of What The [DS] Expects, Trump Preparing For [Zero-Day]? – Ep. 3869

x22report
SPREAD THE WORD
3,581

Watch The X22 Report On Video

pt>

Don Tzu Doing The Opposite Of What The [DS] Expects,Is The Trump Preparing For [Zero-Day]?
Click On Picture To See Larger Picture
The green activist have just been shown they are wrong, some can’t believe and others won’t accept it. The climate agenda is over. Lee Zeldin uncovered the climate money never went to fight climate change. The oil narrative that the [CB] is using has failed. Trump signature will be included on the new currency that they are creating. Is this the beginning of the new US currency? The [DS] wants Trump to go at them with a land invasion in Iran. Don Tzu is going to do the opposite of the [DS]/Experts. They want a long drawn out war that will not end to destroy the economy and Trump presidency, big fail. Trump will use the art of war to get control of the Strait and make Iran think they made a good deal. The WH created a new news and video app. Is the Trump administration preparing for zero-day, its starting to look like it.

 

Economy

Net Zero Activists Stumped By Shock New Evidence Showing No Link Between CO2 & Temperature Over Last Three Million Years 

  • The climate science world (‘settled’ division) is in shock following the discovery in ancient ice cores that levels of carbon dioxide remained stable as the world plunged into an ice age around 2.7 million years ago. Levels of CO2 at around 250 parts per million (ppm) were said to be lower than often assumed with just a 20 ppm movement recorded for the following near three million-year period. In addition, no changes in methane levels were seen in the entire period. Massive decreases in temperature with occasional interglacial rises appear to have occurred without troubling ‘greenhouse’ gas levels, and this revelation has caused near panic in activist circles. The assumed level three million years ago of CO2 was around 400 ppm, a convenient mark that has been used to explain the subsequent ice age and a drop to 250 ppm. Due to the recently published paper, this explanation has become more problematic and natural climate variation is correctly noted to have occurred with the temperature changes. Alas, similar explanations are mostly ignored in discussing today’s climate changes in the interests of promoting the Net Zero fantasy. 
  • The title of the paper, produced by 17 America-based scientists, was enough to set alarm bells ringing in the ‘settled’ science, Net Zero-obsessed community: ‘Broadly stable atmospheric CO2 and CH4 levels over the past three million years.’ A related paper examining ocean heat content derived from the ice core record was also published. Carrie Lear, Professor of Past Climates and Earth System Changes at Cardiff University, claimed that the papers “don’t rewrite the role of CO2, they underline how sensitive the climate system is… that is why today’s rapid  CO2 rise is so alarming”.

Source: zerohedge.com

  friends and donors are receiving our stolen money. THIS IS INSANE

  • JL:Trump is NOT going to make the taxpayers pay it back. There’s an executive order on the books that “magically” got renewed every year under Biden too. Tariffs instead of taxes. It’s coming.

 

  president focused on lowering their costs

  •   facilities, this dependency will mean higher prices & tighter supply ahead. Arizona has ZERO refineries of its own. With your military background – you of all people recognize that recent events have shown how unwise it is to allow an economy to be at risk of foreign choke points half way across the world. AZ is no different. We recommend AZ decouple itself from CA energy policy as soon as possible. Thank you for sharing your views. We will certainly keep them in mind.

 Trump’s current administration (January 20, 2025 – present, through ~March 25, 2026).

Biden~168 days Approximately 168 calendar days with daily WTI spot prices above $100 per barrel during Biden’s administration (January 20, 2021 – January 20, 2025).

Trump~0 days 0 calendar days with daily WTI spot prices above $100 per barrel during Donald Trump’s first administration (January 20, 2017 – January 20, 2021).

Obama~410 days Approximately 410 calendar days with daily WTI spot prices above $100 per barrel during Barack Obama’s administration (January 20, 2009 – January 20, 2017)

. Bush~225 days Approximately 225 calendar days with daily WTI spot prices above $100 per barrel during George W. Bush’s administration (January 20, 2001 – January 20, 2009).

The vote passed 417 in favor to 154 against, with 71 abstentions. This advances the EU’s side of the broader “Turnberry Agreement” trade deal negotiated last July 2025 between the European Commission (led by Ursula von der Leyen) and the Trump administration.  

  •  This was the Parliament adopting its negotiating position. The text still needs approval from EU member states (the Council) and a final Parliament vote (expected April–June 2026). It’s a big step forward, but not automatic implementation.

  on the public markets). The death of private companies would result in the death of the major innovation engine that has made the USA the greatest economy in the world.
Had such a scheme existed 50 years ago, Apple, Meta, Google, Tesla, Space-X, etc. etc. would never have come into being because they would never have been able to raise VC start-up capital.
If this law were to come to pass, unemployment will skyrocket, innovation will plummet, standards of living will be reduced to third world levels, and capital will flee offshore. The nation will tumble into a decades-long Depression and none of the “social justice” ideas Big Chief Lizzie is speaking about will be affordable or even possible. This is the worst economic idea anyone has suggested in any of our lifetimes.
But don’t worry, Big Chief Lizzie will still get rich off of campaign contributions from the big banks and publicly-trade companies who will be the few beneficiaries of this nation-destroying idea.

Donald Trump plans to add his signature to US currency

President Trump is adding his signature to U.S. currency, marking a historic first where a sitting president’s autograph will appear on all denominations of bills. The Treasury Department is developing new printing plates for this change, which is expected to take effect in the coming months and remain until another administration decides otherwise.

Trump’s signature will replace that of the U.S. treasurer, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s signature remaining. Brandon Beach remarked, “the president’s mark on history as the architect of America’s golden age economic revival is undeniable.” Additionally, a gold coin featuring Trump’s likeness has also been approved for the nation’s 250th anniversary.

Image

CPFF (Commercial Paper Funding Facility) – buying commercial paper from the issuer. PMCCF (Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility) – buying corporate bonds from the issuer. TALF (Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility) – funding backstop for asset-backed securities. SMCCF (Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility) – buying corporate bonds and bond ETFs in the secondary market. MSBLP (Main Street Business Lending Program) – Details are to come, but it will lend to eligible small and medium-size businesses, complementing efforts by the Small Business Association.

To put it bluntly, the Fed isn’t allowed to do any of this. The central bank is only allowed to purchase or lend against securities that have government guarantee. This includes Treasury securities, agency mortgage-backed securities and the debt issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. An argument can be made that can also include municipal securities, but nothing in the laundry list above.

So how can they do this? The Fed will finance a special purpose vehicle (SPV) for each acronym to conduct these operations. The Treasury, using the Exchange Stabilization Fund, will make an equity investment in each SPV and be in a “first loss” position. What does this mean? In essence, the Treasury, not the Fed, is buying all these securities and backstopping of loans; the Fed is acting as banker and providing financing. The Fed hired BlackRock Inc. to purchase these securities and handle the administration of the SPVs on behalf of the owner, the Treasury.

In other words, the federal government is nationalizing large swaths of the financial markets. The Fed is providing the money to do it. BlackRock will be doing the trades.

This scheme essentially merges the Fed and Treasury into one organization. So, meet your new Fed chairman, Donald J. Trump.

 4 – to any NGO I’ll give 1,000 to 1 odds. Takers?

 

Political/Rights

DOGE

 

Geopolitical

War/Peace

 Bank, oil fields, and a seat at the UN. The IRGC isn’t defending Iran; it’s occupying it. They’ve turned a potential G20 powerhouse into a launchpad for global instability and

So in the beginning, the terrorist attacked nations that didn’t attack it. They were not hitting bases they were hitting hotels, buildings. 

 

 shut. Looks like they’re getting ready for a long fight

 

 

  block it. The most telling quote came from Emirati minister Sultan al-Jaber: “Iran holds Hormuz hostage. Every nation pays the ransom, at the gas pump, at the grocery store, at the pharmacy.” Trump begged NATO for weeks. Germany said no. Japan said no. France stalled. Britain offered drones. The country that actually stepped up is a Gulf monarchy that’s been absorbing 2,000+ Iranian attacks since February 28th.

  act of occupation and a permanent scar. Today, a comfortable consensus has formed in foreign-policy salons and on Wall Street that the Trump administration has no strategic vision for the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran is “winning” the confrontation in the Gulf by default. Nothing could be further from the truth. It is hard to believe how casually many of these critics ignore history, including the way control of financing, insurance, and maritime chokepoints has repeatedly reshaped great-power influence.

Half a century after the shah’s grab, the question surrounding these islands is no longer simply “who owns them,” but “who secures the most critical chokepoint in the global oil trade.” With President Trump moving to provide American-backed insurance for ships transiting the Gulf, Washington is displacing the remnants of British dominance in maritime insurance and risk. Whoever insures the traffic does not just collect premiums; they hold a de facto veto over it and gain visibility into every meaningful cargo, what moves, in what volume, from where and to where.

This emerging architecture gives the United States something London once enjoyed: an indirect presence in every Gulf port that depends on uninterrupted access to global insurance and reinsurance. The logical next step is geographic as well as financial. Returning Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, and Lesser Tunb to the United Arab Emirates would not only correct a historical wrong against Arab inhabitants whose ties to these islands long predate the shah’s gunboat diplomacy. It would also provide the legal and political foundation for a formal U.S.–UAE security arrangement on the islands themselves. Critics will bristle at the idea of a sustained American military presence on these rocks.

But the alternative is not some neutral, demilitarized utopia. The alternative is that the Strait of Hormuz, through which a large share of the world’s seaborne oil flows, remains vulnerable to coercion, sabotage, and blockade. A long-term U.S. presence, at Emirati invitation, would anchor a security order built around free navigation, reliable energy flows, and clear red lines against maritime blackmail.

This is not just about three islands. It is about restoring the principle that territory cannot be seized by surprise and held indefinitely by force, and about extending a coherent maritime strategy from Hormuz to the Bab el-Mandeb. If the United States is serious about securing the arteries of global trade for decades to come, then correcting the injustice of 1971 and placing these islands under Emirati sovereignty, with an American flag flying alongside the UAE’s in a carefully structured basing agreement, is not an overreach. IMHO, It is the minimum credible foundation for a stable Gulf and the clearest rebuttal yet to those who insist that America has no plan.

 

 Do These Islands Control Access to the Strait of Hormuz?Yes, they provide significant strategic leverage over access,  
The islands sit at the western approaches/entrance to the Strait of Hormuz (the narrow chokepoint between the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman). Due to water depths, the main shipping lanes for large oil tankers and commercial vessels must pass between Abu Musa and the Tunb islands.

  • This positioning allows the controlling power (currently Iran) to:
    • Monitor and surveil nearly all traffic.
    • Deploy missiles, naval forces, or mines for rapid interdiction.
    • Project power over ~20% of global oil transit (and much of the world’s liquefied natural gas).

They do not physically block the entire strait (which is wider and has other routes), but they are often described as enabling Iran to “command the traffic” or threaten closure in a crisis. This is why they feature prominently in regional security discussions.

and 2,200 nautical miles on patrol. These vessels can run surveillance or be used as kamikazes against Iranian fast-attack boats. Ukraine proved the concept by crippling Russia’s Black Sea Fleet with explosive drone boats reportedly costing around $250,000 each. For context, a single Iranian anti-ship cruise missile costs millions and a U.S. destroyer runs about $2 billion. Iran has already used sea drones to hit oil tankers twice during this war. 

 

 they can to sabotage the vitally necessary reform of their sins. Pretty much everything happening in American politics today can be understood through this prism.

 Trump fighting a [DS] that is desperate to hang onto its power after decades of policy failures. Among the failures of the establishment “experts” over the last 3 decades:

 

 

 

Now the DS would like Trump to mount a ground invasion, they know this will go on forever, so does Trump. Think about it, the DS kept trying to push into a civil war and trump decided, no, I will attack the DS in a different way. So the question is, is trump going at Iran in a different way than the DS is planning on. Absolutely. 

 Don Tzu Art of War
Direct military seizure of these islands would be a disaster—Iran could mine the strait, spike oil prices, and turn the Gulf into a shooting gallery. Trump, the ultimate deal-maker, would treat this exactly like Sun Tzu advises: win the islands intact, with Iran’s grudging consent, before any shots are fired in earnest.
Here’s how he’d might do it,  
  the U.S. and UAE hold the cards—oil leverage, Abraham Accords partners (Israel + Gulf states), and the ability to choke Iran’s remaining revenue streams. Trump would not rush in blind; he’d wait until Iran is exhausted and isolated
.2.  “The highest form of generalship is to balk the enemy’s plans… next best is to disrupt his alliances… the worst policy is to attack cities.”
Trump wouldn’t storm the islands. He’d balk Iran’s entire regional strategy. Recent U.S. airstrikes (including reported hits near Abu Musa) already weakened Iran’s posture. Next move: tighten the economic noose with “maximum pressure 2.0” while publicly dangling a face-saving exit ramp—limited sanctions relief or security guarantees in exchange for “returning” the islands to UAE sovereignty. Iran gets to claim it “negotiated a grand bargain,” not surrendered. , make the enemy think he chose the outcome.
  • Truth out that the islands are “not worth American blood” while quietly moving carrier groups into the Gulf (showing strength without saying it).
  • Float wild rumors of a “new nuclear deal” or “Gulf security pact” that never materializes—until Iran bites.
  • Use back-channel emissaries (Oman, Qatar, even Russia/China as “honest brokers”) so Iran never sees the U.S. hand directly. The goal: make Tehran believe the U.S. is distracted elsewhere while the real pressure builds on the Hormuz chokepoint.


The islands sit right in the shipping lanes. Trump would turn that geography into leverage:

  • Rally the entire GCC + Israel behind the UAE claim (already happening quietly).
  • Offer Iran a quiet “face-saver” package: normalized trade routes, reduced naval harassment, maybe even a face-saving “joint environmental zone” that quietly gives the UAE civil control.
  • Position U.S. forces for a post-deal base on the islands—framed as “regional security cooperation,” not occupation. Iran folds because the alternative is watching its economy crater while the strait stays open under U.S.-UAE watch.

5. Win Intact, Without Protracted War   “There has never been a protracted war from which a country has benefited… take the enemy’s state intact.”
Trump’s timeline would be brutally short—weeks, not months. He’d set public “deadlines” (as he already does), 

. Iran gets sanctions breathing room; the UAE gets the islands; the U.S. gets a forward base that lets it dominate the strait without a single new war

Trump wouldn’t “take” the islands—he’d make Iran hand them over while thinking it won. 

  1.  Trump isn’t rushing to bomb the energy plants (which would cause massive civilian/economic fallout and risk wider war). Instead, he’s using the credible threat of destruction as leverage to force negotiations and concessions (reopening the strait, de-escalation). The pause keeps the pressure on while giving diplomacy time to work. 
  2. Trump is demonstrating perfect tempo control. He issues deadlines → creates urgency → pauses/extends at the last moment → repeats. This keeps Iran off-balance, forces them to the table on U.S. terms, and avoids the costs/risks of immediate escalation. It’s flexible, patient, and keeps the initiative entirely with the U.S.

  3. Targeting energy infrastructure (instead of cities or military bases) is highly efficient: it cripples Iran’s economy, oil exports, and power grid without a full invasion. Sun Tzu would approve of attacking the opponent’s “vital points” (logistics, economy, morale) rather than fighting head-on. The pause gives Iran a face-saving way to negotiate while the threat remains live.

 

Trump is essentially saying: “I can crush your energy sector any time I want… but I’m choosing to let talks succeed first.” 

 

Medical/False Flags

[DS] Agenda

 

  • Almost every viable Democrat in modern cycles (Obama, Clinton, Biden, Sanders, Buttigieg, etc.) made multiple early trips to both Iowa and New Hampshire right after announcing or even before.
  •  
  • Potential 2028 candidates are already doing exactly this. As of early 2026, figures like Pete Buttigieg, Gavin Newsom, Andy Beshear, J.B. Pritzker, and others have made high-profile visits to New Hampshire for events, fundraisers, and speeches — months or even years before any announcement. This is widely seen as early campaigning or testing the waters

  • New Hampshire is one of the top destinations, but the very next trip is usually to one of the other key early-state contenders: Iowa, South Carolina, or sometimes Michigan/Nevada.

 

 

 

President Trump’s Plan

 along with many other things he figured out (all documented for posterity in my book).

  are not true. In real life, almost no one knows that the Russia collusion plot was cooked up by the Clinton campaign, or that there is a transcript proving Flynn did not lie, or that the Ukraine impeachment scam began the morning after Mueller’s train wreck testimony because they needed a new hoax, or that Fauci demonstrably sent money and technology to the Wuhan lab for them to create deadly coronaviruses. The list goes on and on. And yet, in polite society, you are still treated like a crank for knowing these things rather than repeating the approved version of events. That is a very big problem. So until there is at least some agreement on basic, provable facts, there is no real point in debating anything. If the inputs are garbage, the outputs will be too.

 

DHS Funding Bill Advances in the Senate: Did Republicans Cave?

  • Day 42 of the second Schumer government shutdown is showing signs of ending. Early Friday, the Senate voted to advance the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill — with caveats.

The Senate unanimously advanced a deal to reopen most of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in the wee hours of Friday morning, 42 days into the shutdown that was spurred by the Trump administration’s immigration operations in Minnesota.

It was an agreement that largely gave Schumer and Senate Democrats what they wanted — no funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and parts of Customs and Border Protection (CBP). But it lacked the stringent reforms they desired, like requiring judicial warrants or requiring agents to unmask.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) does not view this as a Republican cave because Democrats still did not receive the “ICE reforms” they demanded.

In an attempt to save face, Senate Minority Leader Schumer (D-NY) claimed his caucus had the upper hand and blamed Republicans.

“This is exactly what we wanted,” Schumer said. “This is what we asked for, and I’m very proud of my caucus. My caucus held the line.” […]

 

  • Another blow to the Democrat plot: On Thursday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin to pay TSA employees.

Source: redstate.com

https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/2037488416711913798?s=20

 Dealers, and thousands of Murderers, many of whom killed more than one person. Because the Democrats have recklessly created a true National Crisis, I am using my authorities under the Law to protect our Great Country, as I always will do! Therefore, I am going to sign an Order instructing the Secretary of Homeland Security, Markwayne Mullin, to immediately pay our TSA Agents in order to address this Emergency Situation, and to quickly stop the Democrat Chaos at the Airports. It is not an easy thing to do, but I am going to do it! I want to thank our hardworking TSA Agents and also, ICE, for the incredible help they have given us at the Airports. I will not allow the Radical Left Democrats to hold our Country hostage any longer. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP

They can’t stop Trump from doing this. Trump is declaring it an emergency and the Supreme Court will back him on his Constitutional authority to do so. The democrats are part of the enemy “insurgency.”

Q drop 4700 Sep 14, 2020 12:34:31 PM EDT CounterINSURGENCY may be defined as ‘comprehensive civilian and military efforts taken to simultaneously defeat and contain INSURGENCY and address its root causes’.

Q Q drop 553 Jan 19, 2018 12:04:38 AM EST The TELL.

How can we listen in, track, and monitor American citizens [bad actors]?

[We hear you].

We see you].

What must we LEGALLY demonstrate in order to gain such warrants?

FISA?

Do we TRUST the FISA judges? MIL INTEL? STATE SECRETS?

Why is this relevant?

Who can we TRUST?

Expand your thinking. Q

TAKE A LISTEN

President Trump SHUTS DOWN Media Hysteria as Democrats MELT DOWN After He LEGALLY Casts Mail-In Ballot in Florida

  • During Thursday’s roundtable, the President didn’t hold back when Jim Acosta’s girlfriend, Liz Landers of PBS, tried to grill him on his decision to vote by mail.
  • Trump dismantled the narrative that there is any comparison between a President using a legal, requested absentee ballot and the Democrats’ push for mass, unverified mail-in chaos.
  • Trump laid it out crystal clear for anyone with a functioning brain:

“Tell me about mail-in ballots, go ahead. You mean I used a mail-in ballot? You probably said yeah, I did. You know why? Because I’m President of the United States. And because of the fact that I’m President of the United States, I did a mail-in ballot for elections that took place in Florida because I felt I should be here instead of being in the beautiful sunshine taking— But you were in Palm Beach, sir, the last few weekends. That’s right.

And I, yeah, and I decided that I was going to vote by mail-in ballot because I couldn’t be there. Because I had a lot of different things. But, you know, we have exceptions for mail-in ballots. You do know that, right?

So if you’re away, we have an exception. If you’re in the military, we have an exception. If you’re on a business trip, we have an exception. If you’re disabled, we have an exception. And if you’re ill, if you’re not feeling good. So I was away mostly in Washington, D.C., so I used a mail-in ballot. But I appreciate the question because I know, I know it was so well-meaning.”

Truth bomb dropped. The President of the United States has national security duties, White House obligations, and a country to run. He wasn’t lounging on the beach — he was working for YOU, the American people.

And the rapid response team nailed it perfectly:

 

He has consistently drawn a clear distinction between:

  • Targeted absentee/mail-in ballots (with safeguards)
  • Mass, universal mail-in voting (with no accountability)

So here’s the obvious question: If soldiers risking their lives overseas have long been allowed to vote absentee… why wouldn’t the Commander-in-Chief, responsible for leading them, be afforded the same right?

The answer is simple: he is. And he used it legally.

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

2793

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f40549 No.5247821
Chatter uptick re: how to effectively prevent cross-talk re: anti-narrative across all social media/online platforms.
Ability to prevent cross-talk narrows comms only to FAKE NEWS which provides for more control over what is released to inform the public.
A series of scenarios is currently being conducted [‘game the sys’] to test response, risk, and calc results.
‘Censorship’ [added] layers of inserted code ‘through keyword targeting’ in bio, history, and comments + indiv platform mods has failed to curtail the problem.
‘China-Russia-Iran’ ‘fake’ take-down hacks of select platforms (for maintenance) is one scenario being game-played.
[Zero-Day]
Countermeasures in place.
[Example]
Think Emergency Alert System.
Think WH controlled *new* RT ‘news’ website
Think WH controlled *new* video stream platform
Think Here.
Should this occur, immediate steps will be taken to classify each as ‘Public Utility’ (essential public services) to gain appropriate gov regulation (control).
Why do we make things public?
Q

You May Also Like

[C] Before [D], It’s Getting Ready To Blow – Episode 1944

x22report

Drip, Drip, Prepped And Ready, Enjoy The Show – Episode 1945

x22report

Investigations By OIG Completed, Facts Dominate, [DS] Scrambles – Episode 1946

x22report