The Conspiracies Are Now Truth, It All Goes Back To The Election, Supreme Court On Deck – Ep. 2957

• Seven states took steps to restrict childhood sex change procedures ranging from social transitions to surgeries in 2022 amid growing concern about the procedures’ safety and effectiveness.
• The gender transition process for minors can include socially transitioning through a new name and pronouns of the opposite sex, as well as through medical interventions like puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and various surgeries, all of which are legal for children in most U.S. states. Several Republican-led states have moved to ban some or all of these procedures for minors, often arguing that, while most adolescents grow out of their gender dysphoria by the time they reach adulthood, these medical interventions are irreversible.
• Alabama, Arizona, Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Oklahoma banned medical transitions for minors in 2022, joining a handful of states which had already done so.

Source: beckernews.com

• The ECRA, buried deep in the $1.7 trillion “omnibus” spending package,
•  
• The Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022, also known as the ECRA, is a brazen Congressional attempt to take control of federal elections away from elected state legislatures and give it to liberal judges and unelected bureaucrats. Thus, it would likely fall afoul of a Supreme Court decision that would strike down some of the Electoral Count Reform Act’s provisions, a highly respected Constitutional scholar argues.
• It also qualifies that, “Any [legal] action brought by an aggrieved candidate for President or Vice President that arises under the Constitution or laws of the United States with respect to the issuance of the certification…” shall be held in the venue of a “Federal district court of the Federal district in which the State capital is located.”
• A Constitutional scholar named Rob Natelson, who taught Constitutional law for twenty-five years and whose scholarly research has been cited numerous times in Supreme Court cases, believes that the ECRA constitutes federal overreach. It is therefore likely to be struck down in some measure by the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Natelson, a Senior Fellow in Constitutional Jurisprudence at the Independence Institute, maintains that the revised Electoral Count Act is a “poison bill” and a “probably unconstitutional effort to meddle with state legislative control over presidential elections.”
•  “The Supreme Court says the manner of choosing presidential electors is under the absolute control of the state legislatures acting alone,” he added. “This bill would tie the state legislatures’ hands by injecting state governors, judiciaries, and federal courts into the process.”

Source: beckernews.com