Reports 

The [DS] Is Boxed In, SC Gave Trump The Ammunition He Needed, Midterms Are Safe – Ep. 3937

x22report
SPREAD THE WORD

Watch The X22 Report On Video

pt>

The [DS] Is Boxed In, SC Gave Trump The Ammunition He Needed, Midterms Are Safe
Click On Picture To See Larger Picture
Canada has entered a recession, they have posted two consecutive quarters with negative GDP. They losing against Trump and it is destroying their economy.Gas prices are dropping dramatically and they will go even lower. The SC gave Trump a path in regards to the Federal Reserve, he now has the ability to remove Cook, plus it shows that the Fed is not controlled by anyone, it is a fourth branch of gov. The [DS] players are now boxed in. The D party is being transformed into a communist party. The moderator D’s are going to have to make a choice at the voting booths, go with the communist or vote another way in secret. Trump is getting the ammunition he needs to make real election reform, the people now see it. Midterms will be safe, Trump knows how important the midterms are for the survival of this country and he is not leaving anything to chance.

 

Economy

  •  Canada has slipped into a recession, posting two consecutive quarters with a negative GDP outcome.  There are multiple reasons for this shrinkage, but the dominant factor is, well, quite frankly, Canadian politics and economic policy.
  •  Meanwhile, in Mexico the opposite is happening.  Mexico’s economic activity grew 1.2% in April from the prior month, the national statistics agency said, compared with a revised increase of 0.6% in March and beating a forecast of a 0.9% increase in a Reuters poll of analysts. {source}
  • It is not coincidental to see the Mexican economy performing well, while the Canadian economy is contracting.  Despite their identical proximity to The United States, each nation is currently executing a fundamentally different set of economic policies.
  • The Canadian government has been exceptionally combative with the U.S.A, leading to friction, tariffs and economic back-and-forth measures between the two nations.
  • The Mexican government has expressly understood the nature of their dependency, admitted it, taken no action to diminish it, and purposefully set out to align itself with the interests of America.
  • One datapoint that points to the USA-Canada disconnect comes in the auto sector. The Center for Automotive Research (CAR) reports that Canadian vehicle production dropped 15 percent year-over-year through April. It’s understood that factories in Canada built approximately 64,000 fewer vehicles through April than the year prior, while US production rose by roughly 44,000 units, or 1.2 percent. {source}
  • Auto manufacturing companies in Canada operate there as part of the business plan to sell vehicles into the USA.  As Canada increases friction with the USA, which is setting up a dynamic of U.S. withdrawal from the USMCA, those auto manufacturers will increasingly shift production from Canada to the U.S. market.
  • It appears that Prime Minister Mark Carney’s response to this predictable auto-sector outcome, is to flip those production facilities into venues for Chinese EV production (BYD and Geely).  However, Democrats and Republicans are united in alignment with President Trump on this issue and Chinese EVs will not be permitted entry into the USA.  This is a very big point of friction.

Source: theconservativetreehouse.com

Bank of America sees summer stock market pullback before possible year-end rally

  • Bank of America technical strategist Paul Ciana is warning that U.S. stocks may be entering a corrective phase during the third quarter after a powerful rally in the first half of 2026. While the bank still sees the potential for a stronger market later in the year, its technical indicators suggest investors should prepare for increased volatility, consider risk management strategies and expect a tougher environment for stocks over the summer. 

Source: msn.com

Data centers start to drive residential electricity bills down

 

  • Several major electric utilities have recently announced that their residential customers will have lower electric bills because of major investments in new power plants and the electric grid, enabled by data centers.
  • Data centers generally need electricity 24/7 and are willing to pay whatever is necessary to ensure reliable power is always available. That enables more plants to be built and revitalizes our aging transmission grid.
  • On May 27, the Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC) approved a plan to lower rates by approximately $50 per year for the typical residential customer. Total annual savings will be approximately $285 million.
  • This follows the Georgia PSC’s adoption of a measure in January 2025 that allows for large customers, i.e., data centers, to “be billed using terms and conditions beyond those used for standard customers to address risks associated with these large load users.” It allows contract lengths of up to 15 years and ensures data centers will pay for “upstream generation, transmission, and distribution.”
  • On March 5, Entergy announced, “approximately $5 billion in total savings for 2.3 million customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi because of data center customer agreements in those states.” The savings are over the next 20 years.
  • On February 24, American Electric Power’s Indiana Michigan Power (I&M) company announced it would be filing to reduce base rates, the largest portion of most of its 600,000 customers’ bills, this summer.
  • According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the two states with the highest number of data centers, which together account for 25% of the country’s total, have lower residential electric costs than the national average. For March 2025, the latest period for which statistics are available, Virginia’s rates were 8.1% lower and Texas’s were 11.7% ower.

Source: wnd.com

  sheets were the only liquidity that mattered. In that framework, the retreat of quantitative easing, asset purchases and heavy‑handed forward guidance must mean an impending air pocket in markets. It does not. Liquidity is not declining, its source is changing. Global liquidity remains ample, with broad money and cross‑border credit still expanding rather than contracting.

The regime shift is not from abundance to scarcity, but from publicly manufactured liquidity to privately created credit, and that shift is already visible in the aggregates. The Trump administration is explicitly engineering that shift. President Trump’s economic policy is explicitly built on deregulation and reversing the thicket of post‑GFC rules that pulled risk‑taking into the public sector, with the Fed’s balance sheet and guarantees filling the void. The project now is to roll that back and let private balance sheets, rather than central bank ones, carry the credit cycle.

Yes, the era of financial engineering is ending; the emphasis is shifting back to productive real capital and credit creation tied to actual economic activity. Bessent has framed this as a re‑privatisation of the economy, using deregulation and supervisory reform to lighten capital and leverage constraints and re‑empower banks as intermediaries.

Recalibrating the supplementary leverage ratio so that reserves and Treasuries no longer act as binding constraints is central to unlocking additional lending capacity. This is closer to a Jacksonian political economy than to the post‑2008 technocracy that Wall Street Keynesians still implicitly assume, one where the state sets broad rules and the private sector does the lending. Bessent’s recent appearance at the Economic Club of New York underlined the move away from helicopter‑style central bank dominance, welcoming the retreat from granular forward guidance and emphasising a clearer policy window in which private credit and price signals do more of the work. Kevin Warsh’s arrival at the Federal Reserve fits that template, a smaller balance sheet and narrower mandate as institutional repositioning rather than classic tightening.

The cultural lag is on Wall Street. A generation has hard‑wired the equation, less central bank liquidity equals tighter financial conditions, even as the marginal engine of liquidity has shifted to private credit and is already spinning up. The Doomers are right about one thing, risks remain, private credit cycles can overshoot, and a less activist central bank may mean more volatility at the margin. But by clinging to the helicopter‑money decade, they are missing a regime in which liquidity is not declining but being re‑sourced, leaving quality “liquidity proxies” in banks and private credit structurally mis‑priced for the world that is emerging rather than the one that has already ended.

 SCOTUS strikes! As Justice Thomas writes in his dissent “The Court makes many policy arguments for an “independent” banking agency that exercises executive power free from accountability…but those are ultimately arguments against the Constitution.” What’s more: “Although the Court expresses concern that the President removed a Board member for ‘the first time in the Federal Reserve’s 111-year history,’…it expresses no such concern that it today upholds an injunction against the President’s removal of an executive officer for the first time in the Constitution’s 237-year history.”

  •  
  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Lisa Cook remaining in her position as a member of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors whom President Donald Trump had attempted to fire. By a vote of 5-4 [PDF HERE] [the court says Cook can continue to remain in her job while her challenge to Trump’s removal moves forward.
  •  
  • This is a rather goofball decision when you consider the previous issues with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the high court prior ruling that President Trump can remove the head of the agency.
  • Additionally, if Lisa Cook does not work for the President of the United States, meaning if she doesn’t work for the Executive Branch, then who exactly is she working for?  She doesn’t work for the legislative branch, and she doesn’t work for the judicial branch. Therefore, a de facto mysterious 4th branch of government is created.
  •  
  • If the Federal Reserve Board of Governors are not subject to the plenary power of the executive branch, then who controls it?  If no one, then the Federal Reserve Board (FED) exists to control the American economy without any oversight from any mechanism within the U.S. Constitution.
  • The federal reserve is a fourth branch of government?

Source: theconservativetreehouse.com

 

the Federal Reserve Act (specifically Section 10, codified at 12 U.S.C. § 242).The Statutory Protection in the Federal Reserve ActThe Federal Reserve Act creates the Board of Governors and explicitly states that its seven members are appointed by the President (with Senate confirmation) to staggered 14-year terms. The key language is:

“…each member shall hold office for a term of fourteen years from the expiration of the term of his predecessor, unless sooner removed for cause by the President.”

This “for cause” limitation is the core reason a President cannot simply fire Fed governors at will (unlike many other officials). “For cause” has historically been interpreted (drawing from precedents like Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 1935) to mean things like inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office—not mere policy disagreements or political reasons.This provision was intentionally designed to give the Fed independence from short-term political pressure when setting monetary policy (interest rates, money supply, etc.).  

Trump just proved that the FED is the 4th Branch of Gov and Nobody really has power over it. 

TRUMP NEEDED THE RULING FROM THE SC, IF THE PROPER CAUSE IS SHOWN, THE PRESIDENT CAN REMOVE THE BOARD MEMBER

 Governors of the Federal Reserve System has for the past century served to provide the American people with “‘stable prices,’” “‘maximum employment,’” no “ruinous financial panics,” and a banking system free from “‘suspicion.’”…The Court credits this century of supposed success to the Board’s “independence” from the President, and, in turn, the voters— the “‘common people’” who play the antagonist in the Court’s account of the 19th century. Many do not share the Court’s rosy appraisal of the past century. But if the Court prefers an independent Federal Reserve Board, then its issue is not with the President but with the Constitution. Regardless of whether unaccountable executive officers like Cook would better govern the economy, the Framers rejected such a “promised land of technocratic governance…” They instead chose government by the people. As a court, our duty is not to second-guess that decision, but to uphold it.

Political/Rights

 Temporary means temporary.

  — they can either accept a $2,600 stipend and a flight home to self deport, or they will be removed.

 

 

DOGE

 and Communist fegimes in the western hemisphere. And radical Islamic Regimes in Northwest Africa This phenomenon isn’t immediately apparent but a map. And the dates of the elections shows a trend.

Total U.S. foreign assistance (all agencies, economic + military/development/humanitarian) since the end of World War II (roughly 1946–present) exceeds $3.8 trillion in inflation-adjusted (constant) dollars

George Soros and son Alex have funneled staggering $103M into midterms so far, on track to shatter spending record

  • Billionaire Democratic kingmaker George Soros and his son Alex spent a staggering $102.8 million in the midterm election cycle — making the family chief architects of the party’s seismic shift toward the radical left.
  • With the November elections still more than four months away, George Soros could shatter his own spending record of $128 million set during the last midterms four years ago, when he was the biggest single donor.
  • Of that, a little over half, $52 million, came from George Soros through the private corporation Geosor under his name and the other half, $50 million, from Fund for Policy Reform, a nonprofit which lists Alex Soros as director in tax filings.
  • And that’s without counting the family’s main organization, the Open Society Foundation — which funds efforts to decriminalize drugs, open the border and abolish the police — and its lobbying wing the Open Society Action Fund, which is even more obscure as it doesn’t have to disclose political spending because it’s registered as a nonprofit claiming to do mere advocacy work.
  • Alex Soros, 40, and his father George both sent a maximum contributions of $7,000 ($14,00 total) to Maine senatorial candidate Graham Platner, who’s been accused of misconduct toward women and regularly slams the rich — despite his own wealthy upbringing and lining his pockets with billionaire money.
  • The fat cat’s spawn maxed out donations and sent $7,000 to Jimmy Choo-wearing Omar, who’s been slammed for allegedly knowing about the widespread fraud involving the Somali community in her Minneapolis district. Omar has denied wrongdoing.’ He also sent a max donation of $7,000 to multimillionaire Silicon Valley lefty Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who’s said to be mulling a 2028 presidential run.
  • The nepo baby and his oligarch father also sent maximum donations to two other 2028 Democratic presidential hopefuls with Peach State Pastor Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) and Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) receiving a total of $14,000 each.
  • In all, the Soros’ have already poured an eye-watering 52% more into the family political slush fund than in 2024, when they channeled $67 million into the Democracy PAC, according to campaign filings.

Source: nypost.com

War/Peace

  • Both President Trump and Secretary Rubio well understand that as long as a direct communication process is in place, all of the various regional escalations can be managed safely.
  • Some element within Iran attacks a ship; the USA retaliates and takes out critical infrastructure. The conflicted point does not disrupt the communication process.  This is the optimal solution approach.
  • (Via NBC) – […]  
  • Communications channels created to de-escalate any incidents are in place and technical talks are set to continue, the source added.
  •  . (read more)

Source: theconservativetreehouse.com

 

 

 

Medical/False Flags

[DS] Agenda

 the right of their own party without ever having moved ideologically – even if it’s hard for them to admit as much. I believe that this is impt because left alone in a voting booth, and given the stark choice between the two diametrically opposite visions for the Republic, a good percentage of them will secretly vote for Republicans to save the country.

And I’m talking the Dems’ latest class of literal communist subversives among their ranks who make even the existing Democrat politicians (like Jeffries, Schumer, etc.) look like centrist fools as they mock them and their more traditional Democrat values roundly.

To them, the existing Democrat leadership aren’t nearly far-left/woke enough and need to be cast aside. To me, this makes logical sense if the idea was to promote this communist ilk to the front of the line, out in the spotlight, if you will. And the reason for that is to expose for everyone to see how radical the left really is and where they would take the country.

If correct, it would make a strong case that we have Judas Goats (double agents) implanted at some level of their brain trust, helping lead their party to the slaughter, which is shaping up to be the election in Nov.

 

President Trump’s Plan

 Iran, China) are ideological enemies on paper, but both share a common goal: undermining American sovereignty. They draw on the same infrastructure, the same street-level operatives, the same channels of disruption. The Trump administration is assembling evidence of a multinational structure: foreign governments and actors linked together in ways that are undeniable. Once they have fully mapped the connections and Venezuela is contained, the final step will be striking at the heads of the hydra with RICO: Soros and the foundations.

4366

May 31, 2020 4:10:23 PM EDT
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: b9dffc No. 9398032 
Antifa ‘MAPPING‘ started a long time ago.
Q

 D.C., the Envy of the World, with almost No Crime, and a Beautification process that has been second to none. I will meet with Janeese Lewis George, but must forewarn everyone that Washington, D.C., is again a Safe and Prestigious Community. Many people, including myself, have worked long and hard to get it there, and we will not let it be destroyed by a Communist adherent who has no intention to, MAKE WASHINGTON GREAT AGAIN! President DONALD J. TRUMP

Earlier (around mid-June 2026), when asked about Lewis George potentially winning, Trump told reporters something like: “I wouldn’t like it — and maybe we’d take back Washington and run it on the federal basis. We won’t put up with it.”

  Trump administration has issued executive actions (including an Executive Order and a National Security Presidential Memorandum) that directly address and provide the policy framework for investigating and disrupting the type of activity 

 Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence (September 25, 2025)This is a National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM-7) that explicitly references:

  • Increased political violence, including riots and attacks on ICE officers.
  • Organized networks, entities, organizations, and funding sources behind such violence and intimidation.
  • Motivations tied to “anti-fascism,” anti-Americanism, extremism on migration/border issues, and related ideologies.

Specific directives that cover this scenario include:

  • Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs) must investigate institutional and individual funders, officers, and employees of organizations that sponsor, aid, or abet actors engaging in political violence or terrorism.
  • Investigation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and individuals with close ties to foreign governments, agents, or influence networks who violate the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) or engage in money laundering by funding or supporting entities that encourage domestic terrorism.
  • The Secretary of the Treasury must identify and disrupt financial networks that fund domestic terrorism and political violence, including tracing illicit funding streams and guiding financial institutions on filing Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs).
  • The IRS Commissioner must ensure no tax-exempt entities (i.e., nonprofits/501(c)(3)s) directly or indirectly finance political violence or domestic terrorism, and refer such organizations, officers, and employees to the DOJ for investigation and prosecution.
  • Prioritization of crimes like money laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956), material support for terrorism, conspiracy against rights, and RICO violations.
  • Strategies to dismantle entire networks, similar to approaches used against organized crime.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Bid to Toss E Jean Carroll Sexual Abuse Case

  • The US Supreme Court on Monday rejected President Trump’s bid to toss E Jean Carroll’s sexual abuse case.
  • President Trump will have to pay E. Jean Carroll $5 million.
  •  

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

 to be! New York State created a Law, for an instant speck of time, going back many decades, in order to wrongfully “nab” me. It was tailormade, and this Injustice cannot be allowed to stand! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP

 For the $5 million sexual abuse/defamation verdict (the focus of the article):
The primary appellate path is exhausted. Denial of certiorari by the Supreme Court generally ends federal appellate review in a civil case. The judgment is final.Remaining (narrow) options include:

  • Collection/enforcement challenges — Carroll can now move to enforce the judgment (e.g., asset liens, wage garnishment, or seizure proceedings in federal or New York state court). Trump’s team can contest specific enforcement actions on procedural or practical grounds (e.g., asset valuation or exemptions), but cannot relitigate the underlying liability or verdict merits.
  • Post-judgment relief motions (e.g., under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)) — These allow relief from a final judgment in rare cases involving newly discovered evidence, fraud, or other extraordinary circumstances. Success rates are extremely low after full appeals, especially years after trial.
  • Settlement negotiations — Trump could pursue a confidential settlement with Carroll to resolve payment for this case (and potentially the related one) for a reduced amount. This is a common practical resolution in high-stakes civil litigation.
  • No presidential pardon or executive override applies here — This is a private civil judgment, not a criminal conviction. The President cannot pardon civil liability against himself.

For the separate ~$83.3 million defamation judgment (from the 2024 trial on additional damages/statements):
This is a distinct but related case. The Second Circuit upheld it, denied en banc rehearing in April 2026, and granted a stay on enforcement pending potential Supreme Court review. Trump’s team indicated in early June 2026 that they planned to petition the Supreme Court soon (possibly arguing presidential immunity or the Westfall Act to substitute the U.S. government as defendant, which could moot the defamation claim).

‘BEYOND insane’: U.S. Supreme Court makes major ruling on counting ballots arriving after Election Day

 

  • A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Monday that elections officials can count mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day as long as they were postmarked before that date.

Source: wnd.com

Alito Blasts Mail-in Ballots Received After Election Day in Dissent to SCOTUS Allowing Mail-in Ballots to Be Received AFTER Election Day 

  • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito authored the dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court’s decision on mail-in ballot deadlines on Monday, blasting the majority’s disregard for federal law.
  • Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.
  • Justice Alito writes in the dissenting opinion, “Federal law designates ‘the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November’ as ‘election day,’ 3 U. S. C. §21, and provides that elections for federal office must be held on that date,” noting that the electorate must, in accordance with federal election-day statutes, make its choice on election day.
  • “If ballots received after election day are added to the set of ballots that dictate the election’s outcome, the electorate’s choice does not occur on election day, and the federal election-day statutes are violated,” he continues. “The acceptance of these late-arriving ballots effectively postpones the date on which the electorate’s choice is made, and federal law precludes that postponement.”
  • He further argues that the definition of “election” in “election day” is the “expression of the electorate’s choice,” making it necessary that the final submission and collection of ballots must occur on one election day, not five days after, as permitted by Mississippi law.
  • “Back when all voting occurred in person, the voters went to the polls on election day. They then completed ballots and turned them over to election officials. When the polls closed, those officials had in their possession a fixed collection of ballots, and taken together, those ballots embodied the electorate’s collective choice,” he writes.
  • Today, the use of mail-in voting, he writes, “cannot change the fact that under federal law, the electorate’s collective choice must still be authoritatively expressed on election day.”
  • “The Court disagrees and concludes that the election-day statutes merely require that each individual cast a vote on or before election day. See ante, at 9. But if that is all that the election-day statutes require, there is no sense in which the electorate as a whole can be seen as making its choice on election day. Rather, the electorate’s choice would be made piecemeal over an extended period prior to election day, and that prospect is blatantly contrary to what the election-day statutes demand,” he writes. “Election day is a specified date, not a span of multiple days. The election-day statutes require that federal elections occur on that date.” Alito further notes that under Mississippi’s law, allowing ballot collection to continue for five days after election day, “the ‘election’ is not held until the end of that period” in violation of federal law.
  • Coney Barrett, however, wrote in the majority opinion, “The election-day statutes say nothing about ballot receipt, and we cannot add to the words Congress chose.”
  • “Due dates for absentee ballots have shifted over time. During the Civil War, States that allowed absentee voting imposed an election-day deadline for ballot receipt,” Coney Barrett further argued. “But during World War I, States began counting absentee ballots received after election day.”
  • But Alito debunks Coney Barrett’s claim, writing, “Even when the Civil War took soldiers hundreds of miles from their usual polling places, election day still meant ballot-collection day,” and “regardless of the method a State used, each State continued to mandate that poll workers, whether on the field or ‘back home,’ received soldiers’ ballots by election day.” This includes votes that were mailed, distributed and collected by election commissioners, and polling places that were administered by military officers on the battlefield as ways of ensuring federal law was complied with.
  • “During the World Wars,” he continues, “Congress and at least nine States allowed absentee ballots to arrive after election day in certain situations.” Alito describes the wartime practices of a handful of states as “short-lived outlier rules,” which “shed little light on the original meaning of ‘election’ in the election day statutes,” as only two states allowed ballots to arrive after election day by 1977.
  • “Although post-election-day deadlines have become more widespread in the last five decades, these developments postdate the last election-day statute by over 50 years and the first statute by over a century. These late-intime practices therefore count for little when discerning the timing restrictions that Congress imposed when it enacted those statutes,” he adds, highlighting the legislative intent behind the election day statutes.
  • Alito further slams the majority opinion, writing. “Not only is today’s decision inconsistent with statutory text, legal context, historical practice, and precedent; it also threatens to produce lamentable consequences. The majority’s holding spawns a slurry of troubling election-law questions and risks further undermining Americans’ confidence in election integrity.”
  • “Today’s decision is inconsistent with the terms of the election-day statutes, contemporary election-law principles, two centuries of historical practice, and the case law on the question presented. It opens up and fails to resolve a host of questions for state election officials and courts. And it creates a serious risk of further undermining public confidence in our elections and our system of self-government,” he concludes.

Source: thegatewaypundit.com

 
2. ALL VOTERS MUST SHOW PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP.
 
3. NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS (EXCEPT FOR ILLNESS, DISABILITY, MILITARY DEPLOYMENT, OR TRAVEL!).
 
There is no excuse for a politician, or otherwise, to be against the above three requirements. There is only one reason to oppose — CHEATING! The House of Representatives has approved this vital Act, THREE TIMES. The United States Senate seems unable to do so. In a time when there is a powerful Communist Movement taking place in our Country, one more dangerous than World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor, or September 11th, all Dumocrats, and our five Republican Senate Hold Outs, Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, Thom Tillis, Bill Cassidy, and Mitch McConnell must vote to SAVE OUR COUNTRY. There can be no more excuses! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP

  Criminal, Radical Left Vandals, people that truly hate our Country. They cut the lower surface of a very expensive and strong waterproof padding, in the color of American Flag Blue, and put their hands underneath the surface, and ripped it. Likewise, they cut and butchered a 350 foot long strip, with many 1 and 2 foot individual cuts, creating great damage to this beautiful piece of art that was, last week, 100% free of leaks, and any of the other problems it has had since its building in 1922. It never worked properly until last week and, right after July 4th, when we will drain the water to treat the damage caused by these “animals,” it will again be in perfect shape.

In the meantime, it is working well, the criminally made algae is gone, and the grass, which was destroyed, is being replaced shortly. The visit to Lafayette Park, opposite the front entrance of the White House, which is now complete except for a replacement of some of the original pavers, was wonderful. Lafayette Park has not looked so good since its inception in 1820!

Most importantly on today’s visit, however, was the Secretary of the Interior, and his people, together with me and my staff, studying the dilapidated, worn out, and very dangerous and outdated Golf Course known as East Potomac Golf Links.

Tom Fazio, the Great Golf Course Architect, and his son, Gavin, participated on the tour with us, whereupon it was determined that, on this fantastic site, with water and unparalleled views of D.C.’s Monuments, we will build one of the Greatest Golf Courses anywhere in the World which, importantly, will also be made available to the Public.

When completed, this Course will have the ability to host Major Golf Tournaments, including The U.S. Open, The Ryder Cup, The PGA Championship, and other top PGA Tour events. Many of the trees are badly damaged from years of neglect, putting people in great danger from falling branches, and the trees falling themselves. Additionally, the sprinkler system is gone, there is no filtration, and the remaining sprinklers are incapable of even doing 10% of what is needed.

The grass is largely dead, the greens are virtually unplayable, and the Course is in very poor general condition but, after many years of horrendous maintenance, and little money devoted to the process of upkeep, we have determined that this location can bring tremendous success and prestige back to Washington, D.C., along with what we have already done with respect to the lowest Crime Numbers in many years, and the fixing of 73 of our most important Statues, Monuments, and Fountains. The Course is virtually unplayable! Work on the new Course, which will go quickly, will begin on September 1st. Tom Fazio will be the Course Architect. It will be built through the Department of the Interior, and designed to the Highest Standards of Golf, but also in such a way that the General Public will love it. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP

You May Also Like

[C] Before [D], It’s Getting Ready To Blow – Episode 1944

x22report

Drip, Drip, Prepped And Ready, Enjoy The Show – Episode 1945

x22report

Investigations By OIG Completed, Facts Dominate, [DS] Scrambles – Episode 1946

x22report