The Key & Stone Is How We Take Back The Country, Strategic Military Planning – Ep. 2635

• In this addendum I’m going to discuss two figures that I haven’t yet spent any time on, but have been taking center stage as of late. These two individuals are John Durham and Mike Lindell.  

• January 15th, 2021 – Mike Lindell reportedly meets with President Trump at the White House.
  • This story is interesting because Washington Post photographer Jabin Botsford was able to get a good picture of the notes that Mike was holding in his hand. She stated in her tweet that her picture was taken before the meeting, implying the notes were what Lindell was bringing to the meeting. The notes are certainly interesting as they mention martial law, foreign interference by China/Iran, and triggering emergency powers. Mike Lindell claimed he didn’t even read the notes but instead was just passing them along from lawyers he knows. What I find most interesting about the meeting Mike Lindell had with Trump is that he claimed Robert O’Brien was also present at the meeting. Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA) – Also known as National Security Advisor: Robert O’BrienSo the APNSA (AKA National Security Advisor), which would be Robert O’Brien, is designated as the new National Continuity Coordinator (NCC) which would make sense since he is the Chair of the FMR Executive Committee and that Committee is responsible for implementing and executing a continuity plan. But it also states it could be “his or her designee.” As crazy as this sounds, literally anybody could be the NCC. Whether the NCC is Robert O’Brien or somebody he designated, it’s becoming clear O’Brien plays a major role in devolution and Trump’s battle against the political establishment.

• February 22nd, 2021 – Dominion Voting Systems sued Mike Lindell

Dominion Voting Systems sued both MyPillow and Lindell, seeking damages of more than $1.3 billion. In weeks prior, the company had said Lindell was “begging to be sued.” MyPillow, has since launched a counter-lawsuit against Dominion for $1.6 billion.

• June 12th, 2021 – Mike Lindell claims “that sometime during the month of July, 2021, a case based on a ‘writ of quo warranto’ will be brought directly in the U.S. Supreme Court which will result in a 9-0 decision overturning the 2020 general election and reinstalling President Trump into office.”
• June 14th, 2021 – Mike Lindell announces Cyber Symposium
• July 11th, 2021 – Mike Lindell reportedly met with Donald Trump before Trump’s CPAC Speech

• August 10-12th, 2021- Mike Lindell hosts the Cyber Symposium
  • The symposium left many disappointed and underwhelmed. Here is what Patrick Byrne had to say:

• August 13th, 2021 – Mike Lindell met with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago
• September 21, 2021 – Mike Lindell announces he will take his case to SCOTUS before thanksgiving (November 23rd).
• November 17th, 2021 – Mike Lindell releases recorded interview with Donald Trump
• That brings us to where we are now,
• Quo Warranto
•  quo warranto as defined by Cornell’s Legal Information Institute:

There has been a quo warranto lawsuit filed against a sitting president before. On January 20th, 2009, a quo warranto lawsuit was filed against Barack Obama claiming he was constitutionally ineligible to be the President of the United States.

Here is a summary from an opinion of the case:

• Essentially, the case was dismissed for multiple reasons but the one I’d like to focus on is the “lack of standing.” Here are the 6 different categories of plaintiffs in the case: Active military personnel, former military personnel, state representatives, federal taxpayers, relatives of Obama, and political candidates. Here is what the courts said in regards to proper standing:

• The court ruled that each of the 6 categories of plaintiffs failed to establish standing, that includes state representatives as well as the political candidates, who were on the presidential ballot in California. Feel free to read through the case for more details, but each one was shot down with seemingly justifiable reasoning and according to proper precedent.
• I’m concerned by this because if there is already precedent for dismissing a suit even with state representatives listed as plaintiffs, will Mike Lindell’s quo warranto case also be shot down for similar reasons?
• When I look at the legal definition of establishing standing and how it relates to the case Mike Lindell is bringing before SCOTUS, there is one part that sticks out: “traceable to the challenged action of the defendant, and not the result of the independent action of some third party not before the court.” Does this mean the PCAP data would be irrelevant? Do they have to specifically show Biden and his campaign were directly involved in the theft of the election? Do they have that specific evidence?
• However they decide the standing, and whether or not they even allow the evidence, I’m not even sure it matters.
• Let’s discuss what does matter.
• Part of the Plan?
• In order for Mike Lindell’s case to be effective (whether it succeeds or not) there are two requirements (in my opinion):
• Mike has to have the evidence he claims to have.
  • There is plenty of evidence of voter fraud out there. We have seen numerous examples and even more has come out over the past few weeks (think of the videos from Delaware County, PA). What I am referring to here is the PCAP data which proves foreign interference. I will touch on this again later, but Mike needs to have that evidence and it needs to be solid and irrefutable.
• There has to be multiple states’ Attorney Generals signed on to the case.
  • If there are AGs on board with this case, it means they looked at the evidence Mike has brought forth and found it not only credible, but solid enough to make for a winning case.
• If the above two requirements are met, and bearing in mind that what Mike Lindell is doing seemingly has the endorsement of Donald Trump, then I believe this could be a step in the direction of Trump’s return.
• Allow me to explain.
• There are really only three possible outcomes that I can see resulting from the case Mike Lindell is sponsoring and bringing before the Supreme Court:

1. SCOTUS votes to look at the evidence(A) They look at all the evidence and decide to grant the Quo Warranto and overturn the results of the 2020 election.(B) They look at all the evidence and decide NOT to grant the Quo Warranto and it would appear we remain stuck with Joe Biden
2. SCOTUS votes NOT to look at the evidence of the case, and it would appear we remain stuck with Joe Biden

• For obvious reasons, 1 (A) would be preferred.  
• The remaining two outcomes is where things could get interesting. Again, this all comes down to the evidence being brought forth and requires that there are actually AGs signed on to this lawsuit. If the evidence is what Mike Lindell claims it is, and AGs have signed on, then both outcomes 1 (B) and 2 would result in the United States reaching a full blown constitutional crisis.

• That is when the military would come into play. Here is the military oath of enlistment:

• If the evidence Mike Lindell claims to have is genuine, then we have already seen the failure of both the legislative and executive branches of our government due to rampant election fraud. Many members of congress are illegitimate just like the current “president” occupying the White House. That means on January 6th, an illegitimate congress rubber-stamped an illegitimate president resulting in the failure of both those branches.
• If the only remaining branch of government (judicial) fails to recognize and rectify the 2020 election and illegitimacy of the other two branches, then all three branches of government would no longer be functioning as intended. Our form of government under the United States Constitution would no longer exist; a genuine constitutional crisis. I believe reaching this point would move us another step closer to the reveal of Devolution. We first have to exhaust all available legal and constitutional methods before military involvement is warranted. I truly believe this is how it will play out and here is my reasoning.
• If the evidence Mike has is genuine, he could have went to the same AGs much sooner and got them on board. He could have taken his information to SCOTUS much sooner as he intended to after his August symposium. He could have even taken it to SCOTUS on January 21st. Why didn’t he?
• It comes down to the timing.
•   in order for Trump to return, there needs to be a super majority of Americans ready and willing to accept his return. The fact this has been pushed back until now when it didn’t need to be tells me it was done so on purpose. It has been timed to coincide with the multitude of failures of Biden’s administration and the mass awakening of Americans that has resulted from those highly visible failures.
•  so if Mike Lindell has the AGs on board as he claims, and the evidence he possesses is genuine, than this upcoming SCOTUS date is even bigger than we realize.
•  Regarding Mike Lindell:

• If his PCAPs are genuine, where did he get them?
• If his PCAPs are genuine, why is he allowed to maintain possession of them?
• If his PCAPs are genuine, how is he able to maintain the proper chain of custody necessary to prove they are genuine without a doubt?

• Are John Durham and Mike Lindell operating under the auspices of the military?
• More specifically, is it possible they have been Direct Commissioned into our military while carrying out their roles? Here is what I mean:

Here is what Wikipedia has relating to DCOs:

Civilians can be direct-commissioned into the military when their skills are critical to sustaining military operations. This is common within the military and would be easy to do under the radar. If Mike Lindell and John Durham are actually working as military direct commissioned officers, then it would answer all of the questions.

Regarding Mike Lindell:

• If his PCAPs are genuine, where did he get them?
  • From the military.
• If his PCAPs are genuine, why is he allowed to maintain possession of them?
  • He is working with and under the protection of the military.
• If his PCAPs are genuine, how is he able to maintain the chain of custody necessary to prove they are genuine without a doubt?
  • If any group could prove proper chain of custody it’s the military.

Regarding John Durham:

• Why hasn’t the Biden administration shut him down yet?
  • Because he isn’t working with the DOJ, he’s working with the military.

Source:  patelpatriot.substack.com

11

4chan Thread/Post: 147146601 / 147175452
Direct Link: 147175452